* [PATCH] x86/cpu: Strip leading and trailing spaces from the /proc/cpuinfo CPU model field
@ 2015-05-20 11:36 Prarit Bhargava
2015-05-21 13:38 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Prarit Bhargava @ 2015-05-20 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Prarit Bhargava, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin,
x86, Andy Lutomirski, Borislav Petkov, Denys Vlasenko,
Dave Hansen, Igor Mammedov, Fenghua Yu, Brian Gerst
When comparing 'model name' fields in /proc/cpuinfo it was noticed that
a simple test comparing the model name fields was failing. After some
quick investigation it was noticed that the model name fields were actually
different -- processor 0's model name field had trailing white space removed,
while the other processors did not.
Another way of seeing this behaviour is to convert spaces into underscores
in the output of /proc/cpuinfo,
[thetango@prarit ~]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g'
______1_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272
_____63_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272_________________
which shows two different model name fields even though they should be the
same.
This occurs because the kernel calls strim() on cpu 0's x86_model_id field
to output a pretty message to the console in print_cpu_info(), and as a
result truncates the whitespace at the end of the x86_model_id field.
The x86_model_id field should be the same for the same processors. This
patch uses string functions to remove both leading and trailing whitespace
in the x86_model_id field. As a result the print_cpu_info() output looks
like
smpboot: CPU0: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6272 (fam: 15, model: 01, stepping: 02)
and the x86_model_id field is correct on all processors on AMD platforms
[thetango@prarit ~]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g'
_____64_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272
and the functionality is correct on an Intel box:
[thetango@prarit2]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g'
____144_model_name :_Intel(R)_Xeon(R)_CPU_E7-8890_v3_@_2.50GHz
[v2]: use memmove and update patch subject
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 17 ++++-------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index a62cf04..41a8e9c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -419,7 +419,6 @@ static const struct cpu_dev *cpu_devs[X86_VENDOR_NUM] = {};
static void get_model_name(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
unsigned int *v;
- char *p, *q;
if (c->extended_cpuid_level < 0x80000004)
return;
@@ -431,18 +430,10 @@ static void get_model_name(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
c->x86_model_id[48] = 0;
/*
- * Intel chips right-justify this string for some dumb reason;
- * undo that brain damage:
+ * Remove leading whitespace on Intel processors and trailing
+ * whitespace on AMD processors.
*/
- p = q = &c->x86_model_id[0];
- while (*p == ' ')
- p++;
- if (p != q) {
- while (*p)
- *q++ = *p++;
- while (q <= &c->x86_model_id[48])
- *q++ = '\0'; /* Zero-pad the rest */
- }
+ memmove(c->x86_model_id, strim(c->x86_model_id), 48);
}
void cpu_detect_cache_sizes(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
@@ -1122,7 +1113,7 @@ void print_cpu_info(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
printk(KERN_CONT "%s ", vendor);
if (c->x86_model_id[0])
- printk(KERN_CONT "%s", strim(c->x86_model_id));
+ printk(KERN_CONT "%s", c->x86_model_id);
else
printk(KERN_CONT "%d86", c->x86);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Strip leading and trailing spaces from the /proc/cpuinfo CPU model field
2015-05-20 11:36 [PATCH] x86/cpu: Strip leading and trailing spaces from the /proc/cpuinfo CPU model field Prarit Bhargava
@ 2015-05-21 13:38 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2015-05-21 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Prarit Bhargava
Cc: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
Andy Lutomirski, Denys Vlasenko, Dave Hansen, Igor Mammedov,
Fenghua Yu, Brian Gerst
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:36:54AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> When comparing 'model name' fields in /proc/cpuinfo it was noticed that
> a simple test comparing the model name fields was failing. After some
> quick investigation it was noticed that the model name fields were actually
> different -- processor 0's model name field had trailing white space removed,
> while the other processors did not.
>
> Another way of seeing this behaviour is to convert spaces into underscores
> in the output of /proc/cpuinfo,
>
> [thetango@prarit ~]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g'
> ______1_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272
> _____63_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272_________________
>
> which shows two different model name fields even though they should be the
> same.
>
> This occurs because the kernel calls strim() on cpu 0's x86_model_id field
> to output a pretty message to the console in print_cpu_info(), and as a
> result truncates the whitespace at the end of the x86_model_id field.
>
> The x86_model_id field should be the same for the same processors. This
> patch uses string functions to remove both leading and trailing whitespace
> in the x86_model_id field. As a result the print_cpu_info() output looks
> like
>
> smpboot: CPU0: AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 6272 (fam: 15, model: 01, stepping: 02)
>
> and the x86_model_id field is correct on all processors on AMD platforms
>
> [thetango@prarit ~]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g'
> _____64_model_name :_AMD_Opteron(TM)_Processor_6272
>
> and the functionality is correct on an Intel box:
>
> [thetango@prarit2]# grep "^model name" /proc/cpuinfo | uniq -c | sed 's/\ /_/g'
> ____144_model_name :_Intel(R)_Xeon(R)_CPU_E7-8890_v3_@_2.50GHz
>
> [v2]: use memmove and update patch subject
>
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-21 13:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-20 11:36 [PATCH] x86/cpu: Strip leading and trailing spaces from the /proc/cpuinfo CPU model field Prarit Bhargava
2015-05-21 13:38 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox