From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Michael Shuey <shuey@purdue.edu>
Cc: "Drokin, Oleg" <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 13:14:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150523101428.GX22558@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqvwjsJXJYciMDHqy9vEdL6dGLhx3+Pi0_ro6192Z5SGR9Q_w@mail.gmail.com>
We would have applied the v3 patchset but now I don't know because we're
up to v5. We can't apply v5 because there are problems with it. No
one responded to v3 so Greg still might apply it or he might find these
email threads too scrambled and delete everything and ask for a resend.
It's pretty messed up so just wait for Greg to get to it before sending
more patches?
Basically you should only send patches which you assume will be applied.
If no one responds after 3 days then probably that means everyone from
the peanut gallery (Me, Sudip, Joe, the lustre devs), we don't have an
issue. Then Greg does the last review (2-3 weeks later perhaps). But
if it makes it past all the other reviews then generally Greg also will
be ok with it.
Greg applies patches in first come, first applied order. If they don't
apply then you have to redo it. He doesn't invest a lot of time into
figuring out why. So you have to coordinate with the other devs, it's
up to you how you do that.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-23 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 19:50 [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: code cleanups - variable declarations Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove lnet_fini_locks Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove LNetSetAsync Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: Module is LNet, not Portals Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] staging: lustre: lnet: o2iblnd: code cleanup - align whitespace Mike Shuey
2015-05-22 13:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: code cleanup - align spacing Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: code cleanup - variable spacing, indentation Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] staging: lustre: lnet: remove LNET_MUTEX_LOCK macro Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: remove dead code, fix checkpatch.pl issue Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 21:00 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-21 21:29 ` Julia Lawall
[not found] ` <CABqvwjuKypiacf3336j-q450FGKaO4wh0Ld7PF8MGz0VPsYBbw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-22 2:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 5:06 ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-22 8:08 ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 15:42 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 21:16 ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 23:57 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 0:07 ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-23 0:18 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 0:25 ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-23 0:36 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 3:13 ` [HPDD-discuss] " Patrick Farrell
[not found] ` <CABqvwjs=S1VrCHe7M4JnDikGBVN3yqjNMrtSA=UvftGmxSasRQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-22 3:06 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-22 8:04 ` Drokin, Oleg
2015-05-22 10:00 ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-23 6:28 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Categorize some long line length checks Joe Perches
2015-05-23 11:32 ` Julia Lawall
2015-05-23 17:26 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 18:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-23 18:13 ` Joe Perches
2015-05-23 18:21 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-24 2:49 ` [PATCH V2] " Joe Perches
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] staging: lnet: o2iblnd: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-22 10:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: checkpatch.pl cleanups Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 01/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: code cleanups - variable declarations Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 02/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove lnet_fini_locks Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 03/13] staging: lustre: lnet: dead code - remove LNetSetAsync Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 04/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: Module is LNet, not Portals Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 05/13] staging: lustre: lnet: o2iblnd: code cleanup - align whitespace Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 06/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: code cleanup - align spacing Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 07/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: code cleanup - variable spacing, indentation Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 08/13] staging: lustre: lnet: remove LNET_MUTEX_LOCK macro Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 09/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: remove dead code, fix checkpatch.pl issue Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 10/13] staging: lustre: lnet: lnet: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 11/13] staging: lnet: o2iblnd: " Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 12/13] staging: lustre: lnet: socklnd: checkpatch.pl cleanups Mike Shuey
2015-05-21 19:50 ` [PATCH 13/13] staging: lustre: lnet: selftest: checkpatch.pl fixes Mike Shuey
2015-05-22 10:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-05-22 9:21 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] staging: lustre: lnet: code cleanups Dan Carpenter
[not found] ` <CABqvwjsJXJYciMDHqy9vEdL6dGLhx3+Pi0_ro6192Z5SGR9Q_w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-23 10:14 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-05-23 12:09 ` Michael Shuey
2015-05-23 12:39 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-05-23 14:05 ` Michael Shuey
2015-05-31 2:24 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150523101428.GX22558@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=shuey@purdue.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox