public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] rcu: change return type to bool
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 10:10:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150524081018.GB17508@opentech.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432453318.2846.16.camel@perches.com>

On Sun, 24 May 2015, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 09:27 +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 May 2015, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> []
> > > > -	return sum;
> > > > +	return !!sum;
> > > 
> > > Hmm I wonder if gcc is smart enough to do the above without the need
> > > for !!? That is, will it turn to !! because the return of the function
> > > is bool, or does gcc complain about it not being bool without the !!?
> > > Not a criticism of the patch, just a curiosity.
> > >
> > gcc will not complain if you assign a unsigned long to a boolean
> > as I understand it it is a macro and is not doing any type 
> > checking/promotion at all - so anything can be assigned to a bool
> > without warning (including double and pointers).
> > The !! will though always make the type compatible with int so it is 
> > a well defined type atleast as far as __builtin_types_compatible_p()
> > goes, and !! also makes static code checkers happy (that are maybe not
> > as smart as gcc) and it does make the intent of sum being treated 
> > as boolean here clear.
> 
> 6.3.1.2 Boolean type
> 
> When any scalar value is converted to _Bool, the result is 0 if the
> value compares equal to 0; otherwise, the result is 1.
>
As I understand this applies to arithmetic operations so for
bool x = false; int i = 42; x += i; x is defined to be true
but here it is the return type and not an arithmetic operation
so does this apply here without the !!?

the !! is ensuring that it is of type compatible to int as the rank
of _Bool is the lowest and

6.3.1 Arithmetic operands
6.3.1.1 Boolean, characters, and integers
...
2 The following may be used in an expression wherever an int or unsigned 
  int may be used:
  - An object or expression with an integer type whose integer conversion 
    rank is less than the rank of int and unsigned int.
  ...
"If an int can represent all values of the original type, the value is
 converted to an int; otherwise, it is converted to an unsigned int. 
 These are called the integer promotions.48) All other types are 
 unchanged by the integer promotions."


thx!
hofrat

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-24  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-23 14:47 [PATCH RFC] rcu: change return type to bool Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-23 22:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-24  7:27   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-24  7:41     ` Joe Perches
2015-05-24  8:10       ` Nicholas Mc Guire [this message]
2015-05-24  8:38         ` Joe Perches
2015-05-24  8:46           ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-26 18:30             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150524081018.GB17508@opentech.at \
    --to=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox