From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751494AbbEXSZd (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2015 14:25:33 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33461 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751207AbbEXSZc (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 May 2015 14:25:32 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 11:25:31 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Tomas Winkler Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [char-misc-next 2/4] mei: support for dynamic clients Message-ID: <20150524182531.GA6291@kroah.com> References: <1432204551-3470-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <1432204551-3470-2-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1432204551-3470-2-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 01:35:49PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > HBM version 2.0 and above allows ME clients in the system to > register/unregister after the system is fully initialized. > Clients may be added or removed after enum_resp message was > received > > 1. To preserve backward compatibility the driver can opt-in to receive > client add messages by setting allow_add field in enum_req > > 2. A new client is added upon reception of MEI_HBM_ADD_CLIENT_REQ_CMD > > 3. A client is removed in a lazy manner when connection request > respond with MEI_HBMS_CLIENT_NOT_FOUND status > > Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler Is this patch, and the rest, safe to add since I didn't apply your other patch? I'll stop here, please fix up and resend what is left. thanks, greg k-h