* [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments.
@ 2015-05-23 5:06 Shailendra Verma
2015-05-25 7:21 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Shailendra Verma @ 2015-05-23 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar, linux-pm; +Cc: linux-kernel, Shailendra Verma
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
index 1d723dc..3488c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ module_param(max_duration, int, 0444);
/**
- * we can detect a core multipiler from dir0_lsb
+ * we can detect a core multiplier from dir0_lsb
* from GX1 datasheet p.56,
* MULT[3:0]:
* 0000 = SYSCLK multiplied by 4 (test only)
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int cpufreq_gx_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* it needs to be assured that at least one supported frequency is
* within policy->min and policy->max. If it is not, policy->max
- * needs to be increased until one freuqency is supported.
+ * needs to be increased until one frequency is supported.
* policy->min may not be decreased, though. This way we guarantee a
* specific processing capacity.
*/
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments.
2015-05-23 5:06 [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments Shailendra Verma
@ 2015-05-25 7:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-05-25 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shailendra Verma; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, linux-pm, linux-kernel
On 23-05-15, 10:36, Shailendra Verma wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> index 1d723dc..3488c9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ module_param(max_duration, int, 0444);
>
>
> /**
> - * we can detect a core multipiler from dir0_lsb
> + * we can detect a core multiplier from dir0_lsb
> * from GX1 datasheet p.56,
> * MULT[3:0]:
> * 0000 = SYSCLK multiplied by 4 (test only)
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int cpufreq_gx_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> /* it needs to be assured that at least one supported frequency is
> * within policy->min and policy->max. If it is not, policy->max
> - * needs to be increased until one freuqency is supported.
> + * needs to be increased until one frequency is supported.
> * policy->min may not be decreased, though. This way we guarantee a
> * specific processing capacity.
> */
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments.
2015-05-25 7:21 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2015-06-15 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2015-06-15 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar; +Cc: Shailendra Verma, linux-pm, linux-kernel
On Monday, May 25, 2015 12:51:14 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23-05-15, 10:36, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <shailendra.capricorn@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> > index 1d723dc..3488c9c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/gx-suspmod.c
> > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ module_param(max_duration, int, 0444);
> >
> >
> > /**
> > - * we can detect a core multipiler from dir0_lsb
> > + * we can detect a core multiplier from dir0_lsb
> > * from GX1 datasheet p.56,
> > * MULT[3:0]:
> > * 0000 = SYSCLK multiplied by 4 (test only)
> > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int cpufreq_gx_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> >
> > /* it needs to be assured that at least one supported frequency is
> > * within policy->min and policy->max. If it is not, policy->max
> > - * needs to be increased until one freuqency is supported.
> > + * needs to be increased until one frequency is supported.
> > * policy->min may not be decreased, though. This way we guarantee a
> > * specific processing capacity.
> > */
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Queued up for 4.2, thanks!
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-15 23:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-23 5:06 [PATCH] cpufreq:gx-suspmod - Fix two typos in two comments Shailendra Verma
2015-05-25 7:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-15 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox