From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Dongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>,
Lars Ellenberg <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>,
drbd-user@lists.linbit.com, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@inktank.com>, Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 16:04:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150525140413.GA26065@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432318723-18829-9-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 11:18:40AM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
>
> As generic_make_request() is now able to handle arbitrarily sized bios,
> it's no longer necessary for each individual block driver to define its
> own ->merge_bvec_fn() callback. Remove every invocation completely.
It might be good to replace patch 1 and this one by a patch per driver
to remove the merge_bvec_fn instance and add the blk_queue_split call
for all those drivers that actually had a ->merge_bvec_fn. As some
of them were non-trivial attention from the maintainers would be helpful,
and a patch per driver might help with that.
> -/* This is called by bio_add_page().
> - *
> - * q->max_hw_sectors and other global limits are already enforced there.
> - *
> - * We need to call down to our lower level device,
> - * in case it has special restrictions.
> - *
> - * We also may need to enforce configured max-bio-bvecs limits.
> - *
> - * As long as the BIO is empty we have to allow at least one bvec,
> - * regardless of size and offset, so no need to ask lower levels.
> - */
> -int drbd_merge_bvec(struct request_queue *q, struct bvec_merge_data *bvm, struct bio_vec *bvec)
This just checks the lower device, so it looks obviously fine.
> -static int pkt_merge_bvec(struct request_queue *q, struct bvec_merge_data *bmd,
> - struct bio_vec *bvec)
> -{
> - struct pktcdvd_device *pd = q->queuedata;
> - sector_t zone = get_zone(bmd->bi_sector, pd);
> - int used = ((bmd->bi_sector - zone) << 9) + bmd->bi_size;
> - int remaining = (pd->settings.size << 9) - used;
> - int remaining2;
> -
> - /*
> - * A bio <= PAGE_SIZE must be allowed. If it crosses a packet
> - * boundary, pkt_make_request() will split the bio.
> - */
> - remaining2 = PAGE_SIZE - bmd->bi_size;
> - remaining = max(remaining, remaining2);
> -
> - BUG_ON(remaining < 0);
> - return remaining;
> -}
As mentioned in the comment pkt_make_request will split the bio so pkt
looks fine.
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index ec6c5c6..f50edb3 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -3440,52 +3440,6 @@ static int rbd_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> return BLK_MQ_RQ_QUEUE_OK;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * a queue callback. Makes sure that we don't create a bio that spans across
> - * multiple osd objects. One exception would be with a single page bios,
> - * which we handle later at bio_chain_clone_range()
> - */
> -static int rbd_merge_bvec(struct request_queue *q, struct bvec_merge_data *bmd,
> - struct bio_vec *bvec)
It seems rbd handles requests spanning objects just fine, so I don't
really understand why rbd_merge_bvec even exists. Getting some form
of ACK from the ceph folks would be useful.
> -/*
> - * We assume I/O is going to the origin (which is the volume
> - * more likely to have restrictions e.g. by being striped).
> - * (Looking up the exact location of the data would be expensive
> - * and could always be out of date by the time the bio is submitted.)
> - */
> -static int cache_bvec_merge(struct dm_target *ti,
> - struct bvec_merge_data *bvm,
> - struct bio_vec *biovec, int max_size)
> -{
DM seems to have the most complex merge functions of all drivers, so
I'd really love to see an ACK from Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-25 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 18:18 [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-25 5:46 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 14:36 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-26 15:02 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 15:34 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-26 23:06 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27 0:40 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-27 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-26 16:04 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-05-26 17:17 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-27 23:42 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-28 0:36 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2015-05-28 5:54 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-29 7:05 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-29 15:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-01 6:02 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-02 20:59 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-04 21:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-04 22:21 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-05 0:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-05 5:21 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-09 6:09 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-10 21:20 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-10 21:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-06-10 22:06 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-12 5:49 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-18 5:27 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] block: simplify bio_add_page() Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] bcache: remove driver private bio splitting code Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] btrfs: remove bio splitting and merge_bvec_fn() calls Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_discard Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] md/raid5: get rid of bio_fits_rdev() Ming Lin
2015-05-25 5:48 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 7:03 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-25 7:54 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-26 14:33 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 22:32 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-26 23:03 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-26 23:42 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-27 0:38 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-27 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] md/raid5: split bio for chunk_aligned_read Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] block: kill merge_bvec_fn() completely Ming Lin
2015-05-25 5:49 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-25 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2015-05-25 15:02 ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-05-25 15:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-25 15:19 ` Ilya Dryomov
2015-05-25 15:35 ` Alex Elder
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] fs: use helper bio_add_page() instead of open coding on bi_io_vec Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] block: remove bio_get_nr_vecs() Ming Lin
2015-05-22 18:18 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] Documentation: update notes in biovecs about arbitrarily sized bios Ming Lin
2015-05-23 14:15 ` [PATCH v4 00/11] simplify block layer based on immutable biovecs Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-24 7:37 ` Ming Lin
2015-05-25 13:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-05-29 6:39 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-01 6:15 ` Ming Lin
2015-06-03 6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-03 13:28 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-06-03 17:06 ` Ming Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150525140413.GA26065@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=dpark@posteo.net \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=drbd-user@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mlin@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=sage@inktank.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=yehuda@inktank.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).