From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751358AbbEYQXL (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2015 12:23:11 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45589 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751293AbbEYQXH (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2015 12:23:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 09:23:06 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Jiri Slaby , Peter Hurley , Alan Cox , Andy Shevchenko , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ricardo Ribalda Delgado , Tony Lindgren , Yoshihiro YUNOMAE Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250: remove return statements from void function Message-ID: <20150525162306.GG9772@kroah.com> References: <1431315022-10526-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <20150524194609.GB18445@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:53:03AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2015-05-25 4:46 GMT+09:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman : > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:30:22PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> serial8250_set_mctrl() is a void type function. Returning something > >> does not look nice. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c | 5 +++-- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c > >> index 4882027..146f56c 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c > >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c > >> @@ -2019,8 +2019,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serial8250_do_set_mctrl); > >> static void serial8250_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int mctrl) > >> { > >> if (port->set_mctrl) > >> - return port->set_mctrl(port, mctrl); > >> - return serial8250_do_set_mctrl(port, mctrl); > >> + port->set_mctrl(port, mctrl); > >> + else > >> + serial8250_do_set_mctrl(port, mctrl); > >> } > > > > You just changed the logic here! > > > Could you tell me why? > > The logic still looks the same to me. {sigh} you are right. Sorry about that, I'll go dig up the original patch and queue it up, this was my fault in reading the code incorrectly. greg k-h