Re: regulator: da9062: undefined Kconfig option MFD_DA9062

[Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>]

On Fri, 22 May 2015, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:

> On 22 May 2015 09:20 Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> 
> > To: Opensource [Steve Twiss]
> > Cc: broonie@kernel.org; lgirdwood@gmail.com; Support Opensource; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Paul Bolle; Andreas Ruprecht; hengelein Stefan
> > Subject: regulator: da9062: undefined Kconfig option MFD_DA9062
> > 
> > Hi Steve,
> > 
> > your commit 4068e5182ada ("regulator: da9062: DA9062 regulator
> > driver") is in today's linux-next tree (i.e., next-20150522) and adds
> > the following lines of code to drivers/regulator/Kconfig:
> > 
> > +config REGULATOR_DA9062
> > +       tristate "Dialog Semiconductor DA9062 regulators"
> > +       depends on MFD_DA9062
> > 
> > MFD_DA9062 is not defined in Kconfig, so that the dependency is always
> > false.  Hence, the da9062-regulator driver cannot be compiled at the
> > current state.
> > 
> > Is there a patch queued somewhere to add the missing Kconfig option?
> 
> Hi Valentin,
> 
> Mark applied the DA9062 regulator patch into linux-next yesterday, but looking at my
> e-mail history the MFD components are still waiting to be applied I think. The MFD
> component has been reviewed in earlier threads ... 
> 
> [PATCH V1 1/6] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver -- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/17/519
> [PATCH V2 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver -- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/531 
> [PATCH V3 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver -- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/19/523
> 
> And the last patch V3 for the MFD seems to have been a little quiet.
> But, also there were three other patches with this set,
> 
> mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver 
> watchdog: da9062: DA9062 watchdog driver 
> devicetree: da9062: Add bindings for DA9062 driver
> 
> Hi Lee/Mark,
> 
> I'm not sure if the MFD part was missed or if I have not followed the rules properly
> on my submissions for DA9062 MFD & regulators. Could I ask if you would take a
> quick look please?

Nothing has been missed.  I have been very busy, but I will get round
to reviewing.  Your patch is marked as 'important' and is stilling in
my inbox.  My plan is to clear my back-log today.

> > I detected this issue with scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py by diffing
> > yesterday's and today's linux-next tree.
> > 
> > Kind regards,
> >  Valentin

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog