From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754164AbbE1QXP (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2015 12:23:15 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49829 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753243AbbE1QXG (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2015 12:23:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 09:23:00 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: Alan Stern , Heikki Krogerus , Tal Shorer , Sasha Levin , USB list , "" , David Cohen , Felipe Balbi , Lu Baolu Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: ulpi: don't register drivers if bus doesn't exist Message-ID: <20150528162300.GA23837@kroah.com> References: <20150527083933.GA13844@kuha.fi.intel.com> <20150527152116.GA1972@kroah.com> <20150528053938.GB2944@sudip-PC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150528053938.GB2944@sudip-PC> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:09:38AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:21:16AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:16:34AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 May 2015, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > > > > Maybe we need to test for this in the driver core, not allowing drivers > > for busses that are not registered, that might solve the main problem > > here. I'll try to look at it tonight. > may i suggest something like this ? > buildtest with allmodconfig and allyesconfig on x86_64. > built and booted on x86. > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c > index 5005924..95cefa0 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c > @@ -943,6 +943,7 @@ int bus_register(struct bus_type *bus) > if (retval) > goto bus_groups_fail; > > + bus->registered = true; > pr_debug("bus: '%s': registered\n", bus->name); > return 0; > > diff --git a/drivers/base/driver.c b/drivers/base/driver.c > index 4eabfe2..1acae5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/base/driver.c > @@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ int driver_register(struct device_driver *drv) > int ret; > struct device_driver *other; > > + if (!drv->bus->registered) { > + pr_err("Driver %s registration failed. bus not yet registered\n", > + drv->name); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > BUG_ON(!drv->bus->p); > > if ((drv->bus->probe && drv->probe) || > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > index 00ac57c..8fe4745 100644 > --- a/include/linux/device.h > +++ b/include/linux/device.h > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct bus_type { > const struct dev_pm_ops *pm; > > const struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops; > + bool registered; /* DON'T TOUCH THIS */ As if anyone ever looks at comments and follows them :) Anyway, let me look at this some more, I think this needs to go into the individual buses, not the driver core. There's a lot more to initialize than just the driver core for most busses, they should be the ones to allow a driver to be registered or not, not the driver core, which shouldn't care. I have some time on Saturday (very long plane ride), where I'll take a look at this. thanks, greg k-h