From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc/schedstat: Expose /proc/<pid>/schedstat if delay accounting is enabled
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 10:04:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150529080424.GA27235@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529061620.GA17421@naverao1-tp.ibm.com>
* Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> /proc/<pid>/schedstat is currently only available if CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is
> enabled. But, all the fields that this exposes are available and valid
> if CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT is enabled as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 093ca14..3ece303 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -304,14 +304,17 @@ static int proc_pid_stack(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS) || defined(CONFIG_TASK_DELAY_ACCT)
So such #ifdef parades are ugly and are usually a sign of some problem with the
patch - as in this case.
But there's deeper problems as well:
/*
* Provides /proc/PID/schedstat
*/
static int proc_pid_schedstat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
{
seq_printf(m, "%llu %llu %lu\n",
(unsigned long long)task->se.sum_exec_runtime,
(unsigned long long)task->sched_info.run_delay,
task->sched_info.pcount);
return 0;
}
- The sum_exec_runtime field is available unconditionally.
- But the sched_info.run_delay field is only maintained if CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is
enabled.
- Also, the sched_info.pcount field is again only maintained if CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
is enabled.
So the claim in your changelog that these fields are maintained in the
delayaccounting case is plain false: none of the fields are conditional on delay
accounting.
So what's the purpose of your patch?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-29 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-25 7:12 [PATCH] proc/schedstat: Expose /proc/<pid>/schedstat if delay accounting is enabled Naveen N. Rao
2015-05-28 5:11 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-05-28 9:11 ` Balbir Singh
2015-05-29 6:16 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-05-29 8:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-29 8:55 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-05-29 9:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-29 9:45 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-05-29 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-29 17:06 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-06-02 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-25 8:39 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-06-25 12:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-25 18:00 ` Cong Wang
2015-06-25 18:27 ` Naveen N. Rao
2015-06-25 18:40 ` Cong Wang
2015-06-26 8:39 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150529080424.GA27235@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).