linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com,
	sre@debian.org, sre@ring0.de,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org,
	aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com,
	patrikbachan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix n900 dts file to work around 4.1 touchscreen regression on n900
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 13:22:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150529202246.GA26140@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529195629.GA9811@amd>

On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:56:29PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2015-05-29 14:49:55, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 09:32:11PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Fix dts to match what the Linux kernel expects. This works around
> > > touchscreen problems in 4.1 linux on Nokia n900.
> > >     
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.txt
> > > index 4b641c7..09089a6 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/tsc2005.txt
> > > @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ Example:
> > >  		touchscreen-fuzz-x = <4>;
> > >  		touchscreen-fuzz-y = <7>;
> > >  		touchscreen-fuzz-pressure = <2>;
> > > -		touchscreen-max-x = <4096>;
> > > -		touchscreen-max-y = <4096>;
> > > +		touchscreen-size-x = <4096>;
> > > +		touchscreen-size-y = <4096>;
> > 
> > IMHO, the older binding needs to be supported as well. It's fine to
> > update the DTS for the new binding, but even Documentation says
> > touchscreen-max-[xy] and if the driver changed that, the driver should
> > be fixed too. Besides, it seems like this has been in tree since
> > v3.16:
> 
> Agreed. In parent email, I have list of two commits that should be
> reverted.

Well, not exactly. The kernel has never parsed touchscreen-max-x and
touchscreen-max-y, however we did indeed change behavior of
touchscreen_parse_of_params() to reset both max and fuzz if either one is
present... I guess we can adjust the behavior it for the sake of tsc2005.

-- 
Dmitry

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-29 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201505241444.41039@pali>
     [not found] ` <20150527132545.GA23434@amd>
     [not found]   ` <20150527133311.GJ30798@pali>
     [not found]     ` <20150527143722.GA28108@amd>
     [not found]       ` <20150527145837.GA13223@earth>
2015-05-29 19:08         ` 4.1 touchscreen regression on n900 -- pinpointed [was Re: linux-n900 v4.1-rc4] Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 19:25           ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 19:32             ` [PATCH] fix n900 dts file to work around 4.1 touchscreen regression on n900 Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 19:49               ` Felipe Balbi
2015-05-29 19:56                 ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 20:17                   ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-29 20:21                     ` Felipe Balbi
2015-05-29 20:29                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-29 20:34                         ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 20:48                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-29 21:02                             ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 21:38                               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-01  9:55                           ` Maxime Ripard
2015-06-01 14:06                             ` Please revert 3eea8b5d68c801fec788b411582b803463834752 as it breaks touchscreen " Pavel Machek
2015-06-01 14:58                               ` Maxime Ripard
2015-06-01 15:21                                 ` Pavel Machek
2015-06-01 17:47                                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-01 20:27                                     ` Pavel Machek
2015-06-01 20:45                                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-01 20:54                                         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-06-01 21:22                                     ` Maxime Ripard
2015-06-01 21:32                                       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-02  8:25                                         ` Pavel Machek
2015-06-02  9:44                                         ` Maxime Ripard
2015-06-02 17:58                                           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-02 18:08                                             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-25 20:25                                               ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 20:22                   ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2015-05-29 20:03                 ` [PATCH] fix n900 dts file to work around 4.1 touchscreen regression " Maxime Ripard
2015-05-29 20:18                   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-29 20:30                     ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-30 10:14                   ` Pavel Machek
2015-06-01  9:49                     ` Maxime Ripard
2015-06-01  9:54                       ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-30  2:21               ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-05-30  2:24                 ` [PATCH] Input: of_touchscreen - remove interdependence of max/fuzz values Sebastian Reichel
2015-05-30  6:26                   ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 19:57             ` 4.1 touchscreen regression on n900 -- pinpointed [was Re: linux-n900 v4.1-rc4] Maxime Ripard
2015-05-29 20:29               ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 21:17               ` Pavel Machek
2015-05-29 21:36                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-29 21:58                   ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150529202246.GA26140@localhost \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=patrikbachan@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=sre@debian.org \
    --cc=sre@kernel.org \
    --cc=sre@ring0.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).