From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752131AbbFAIxs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 1 Jun 2015 04:53:48 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:35077 "EHLO
	mail-wg0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751567AbbFAIxi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Jun 2015 04:53:38 -0400
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:53:32 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
Cc: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
        "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>,
        Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>,
        Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/17] video: fbdev: gbefb: use arch_phys_wc_add() and
 devm_ioremap_wc()
Message-ID: <20150601085332.GA14549@gmail.com>
References: <1432859434-17821-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
 <1432859434-17821-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
 <20150529064144.GA22749@gmail.com>
 <20150530003256.GG23057@wotan.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150530003256.GG23057@wotan.suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 08:41:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > +		gbe_mem = devm_ioremap_wc(&p_dev->dev, gbe_mem_phys,
> > > +					  gbe_mem_size);
> > 
> > > +		gbe_mem = dma_alloc_writecombine(NULL, gbe_mem_size,
> > > +						 &gbe_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 
> > > +	par->wc_cookie = arch_phys_wc_add(gbe_mem_phys, gbe_mem_size);
> > 
> > > +	arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> > 
> > > +	arch_phys_wc_del(par->wc_cookie);
> > 
> > Could we _please_ rename dma_*_writecombine() to dma_*_wc(), so that the naming is 
> > coherent across the various APIs?
> 
> Sure, OK done. Will send once this series is merged and visible on linux-next. 
> But who's tree should this go through? Since it depends on this series which 
> goes through Tomi's tree should it go through there?

So we could do the rename near the end of the merge window, when all the patches 
have drained from maintainer trees into Linus's tree. Mind keeping it in your tree 
until then?

Thanks,

	Ingo