public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>,
	peifeiyue@huawei.com, dzickus@redhat.com, morgan.wang@huawei.com,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:06:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150601130616.GE20288@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529135045.09d87c7ab98bf26dec95c8b3@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri 29-05-15 13:50:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2015 14:46:23 +0200 Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> > The main source of deadlocks caused by printk() in NMI context has been
> > solved by the commit a9edc88093287 ("x86/nmi: Perform a safe NMI stack
> > trace on all CPUs").
> > 
> > But there are still few warnings printed in the NMI code that could
> > case a deadlock. For example, see the freeze discussed at
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/20/481
> 
> I'm not (yet) convinced that we want the entire patchset btw.  Do we
> really want to try to semi-support printk from NMI?  With a rather
> nasty set of hacks?
> 
> Why not just delete the offending printks?
  And what about WARN_ONs and BUG_ONs? Delete as well? Or just don't print
anything when we are in NMI? I agree that NMI is so problematic context
that restricting printk there makes some sence. OTOH propagating
information from NMI to user is useful as well so I'm somewhat undecided.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25 12:46 [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI context Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28 12:00     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/10] printk: Try harder to get logbuf_lock on NMI Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:14   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28  7:54     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-28 13:50     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-28 20:09       ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-29 10:56         ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-29 20:46           ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 03/10] printk: Move the deferred printk stuff Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 04/10] printk: Merge and flush NMI buffer predictably via IRQ work Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:14   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28 13:12     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 05/10] printk: Try hard to print Oops message in NMI context Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 06/10] printk: Split delayed printing of warnings from vprintk_emit() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] printk: Split text formatting and analyze " Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 08/10] printk: Detect scheduler messages in vprintk_format_and_analyze() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/10] printk: Split text storing logic from vprintk_emit() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 10/10] printk: Split console call " Petr Mladek
2015-05-29 20:50 ` [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup Andrew Morton
2015-06-01 13:06   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2015-06-02  9:46     ` long.wanglong
2015-06-02  9:52       ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150601130616.GE20288@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=long.wanglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=morgan.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox