From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: at91: add Flexcom clock
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 19:15:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150602171536.GG1715@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150602190435.4698a4db@bbrezillon>
On 02/06/2015 at 19:04:35 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote :
> Hi Cyrille,
>
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 18:57:19 +0200
> Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com> wrote:
>
> > This driver supports the new Atmel Flexcom. The Flexcom is a wrapper which
> > integrates one SPI controller, one I2C controller and one USART. Only one
> > function can be enabled at a time. This driver selects the function once for
> > all, when the Flexcom is probed, according to the value of the new
> > "atmel,flexcom-mode" device tree property.
> >
> > This driver has chosen to present the Flexcom to the system as a clock so the
> > implementation is seamless for the existing Atmel SPI, I2C and USART drivers.
>
> Could detail a bit more why you chose to represent this flexcom IP as
> a clock device ?
>
> I don't like to use this 'DT should represent real hardware' argument,
> but to me, it looks like you're trying to use a false hardware
> representation to avoid changing the peripheral drivers code, which is
> wrong since the DT is supposed to represent the hardware blocks.
>
> How about representing the flexcom as an MFD instead ?
>
It should probably be represented as an MFD. The MFD driver will parse
the chosen configuration and the probe the correct driver. You can have
a look at the recent ST LPC driver from Lee.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-02 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-02 16:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] clk: at91: add new driver for Flexcom Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-02 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: at91: add a new compatible string for Flexcom in the DT documentation Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-02 16:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] clk: at91: add Flexcom clock Cyrille Pitchen
2015-06-02 17:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-06-02 17:15 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150602171536.GG1715@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox