public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Work around ia64 build problem with ESRT driver.
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:11:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150605171115.GA22534@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433523746-21734-1-git-send-email-pjones@redhat.com>

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:02:26PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> So, I'm told this problem exists in the world:
> ----------------------------------------------
> Subject: Build error in -next due to 'efi: Add esrt support'
> 
> Building ia64:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> 
> drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c:28:31: fatal error: asm/early_ioremap.h: No
> such file or directory
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> I'm not really sure how it's okay that we have things in asm-generic on
> some platforms but not others - is having it the same everywhere not the
> whole point of asm-generic?
> 
> That said, ia64 doesn't have early-ioremap.h .  So instead, since it's
> difficult to imagine new IA64 machines with UEFI 2.5, just don't build
> this code there.
> 
> To me this looks like a workaround - doing something like:
> 
> generic-y += early_ioremap.h
> 
> in arch/ia64/include/asm/Kbuild would appear to be more correct, but
> ia64 has its own early_memremap() decl in arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h ,
> and it's a macro.  So adding the above /and/ requiring that asm/io.h be
> included /after/ asm/early_ioremap.h in all cases would fix it, but
> that's pretty ugly as well.  Since I'm not going to spend the rest of my
> life rectifying ia64 headers vs "generic" headers that aren't generic,
> it's much simpler to just not build there.
> 
> Note that I've only actually tried to build this patch on x86_64, but
> esrt.o still gets built there, and that would seem to demonstrate that
> the conditional building is working correctly at all the places the code
> built before.  I no longer have any ia64 machines handy to test that the
> exclusion actually works there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile | 5 ++++-
>  include/linux/efi.h           | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
> index 26eabbc..81c8527 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/Makefile
> @@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
>  #
>  # Makefile for linux kernel
>  #
> -obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o esrt.o vars.o reboot.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= efi.o vars.o reboot.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_IA64),)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI)			+= esrt.o
> +endif

Hi Peter,

How about adding a hidden Kconfig option instead ?

config EFI_ESRT
	bool
	depends on !IA64
	default true

Then you could use

obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_ESRT)	+= esrt.o

>  obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS)			+= efivars.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE)		+= efi-pstore.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_UEFI_CPER)			+= cper.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> index 024c27e..1983d17 100644
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -879,7 +879,11 @@ static inline efi_status_t efi_query_variable_store(u32 attributes, unsigned lon
>  #endif
>  extern void __iomem *efi_lookup_mapped_addr(u64 phys_addr);
>  extern int efi_config_init(efi_config_table_type_t *arch_tables);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IA64

and use CONFIG_EFI_ESRT here.

Thanks,
Guenter

> +static inline void efi_esrt_init(void) { }
> +#else
>  extern void __init efi_esrt_init(void);
> +#endif
>  extern int efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz,
>  				   efi_config_table_type_t *arch_tables);
>  extern u64 efi_get_iobase (void);
> -- 
> 2.4.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-05 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 14:49 Build error in -next due to 'efi: Add esrt support' Guenter Roeck
2015-06-05 17:02 ` [PATCH] efi: Work around ia64 build problem with ESRT driver Peter Jones
2015-06-05 17:11   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-06-05 18:54     ` Peter Jones
2015-06-05 19:13       ` Peter Jones
2015-06-05 19:14         ` Peter Jones
2015-06-05 19:23           ` Guenter Roeck
2015-06-08 10:09           ` Matt Fleming
2015-06-08 15:51             ` Mark Salter
2015-06-05 17:14   ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150605171115.GA22534@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox