From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: Work around ia64 build problem with ESRT driver.
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:23:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150605192313.GA20232@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433531694-24439-1-git-send-email-pjones@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:14:54PM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> So, I'm told this problem exists in the world:
> ----------------------------------------------
> Subject: Build error in -next due to 'efi: Add esrt support'
>
> Building ia64:defconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/esrt.c:28:31: fatal error: asm/early_ioremap.h: No
> such file or directory
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> I'm not really sure how it's okay that we have things in asm-generic on
> some platforms but not others - is having it the same everywhere not the
> whole point of asm-generic?
>
> That said, ia64 doesn't have early-ioremap.h . So instead, since it's
> difficult to imagine new IA64 machines with UEFI 2.5, just don't build
> this code there.
>
> To me this looks like a workaround - doing something like:
>
> generic-y += early_ioremap.h
>
> in arch/ia64/include/asm/Kbuild would appear to be more correct, but
> ia64 has its own early_memremap() decl in arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h ,
> and it's a macro. So adding the above /and/ requiring that asm/io.h be
> included /after/ asm/early_ioremap.h in all cases would fix it, but
> that's pretty ugly as well. Since I'm not going to spend the rest of my
> life rectifying ia64 headers vs "generic" headers that aren't generic,
> it's much simpler to just not build there.
>
> Note that I've only actually tried to build this patch on x86_64, but
> esrt.o still gets built there, and that would seem to demonstrate that
> the conditional building is working correctly at all the places the code
> built before. I no longer have any ia64 machines handy to test that the
> exclusion actually works there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
The ia64:defconfig build passes with this patch, so
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
(Compile-)Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-05 14:49 Build error in -next due to 'efi: Add esrt support' Guenter Roeck
2015-06-05 17:02 ` [PATCH] efi: Work around ia64 build problem with ESRT driver Peter Jones
2015-06-05 17:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-06-05 18:54 ` Peter Jones
2015-06-05 19:13 ` Peter Jones
2015-06-05 19:14 ` Peter Jones
2015-06-05 19:23 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2015-06-08 10:09 ` Matt Fleming
2015-06-08 15:51 ` Mark Salter
2015-06-05 17:14 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150605192313.GA20232@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox