From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Add code_probe and codec_remove stubs
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 17:43:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150609164329.GC27675@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150609162045.GF14071@sirena.org.uk>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:20:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:13:56PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:00:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > I'm still not a big fan of the double registration that's being done -
> > > if nothing else the fact that it's not also factoring out the creation
> > > of the DSP controls seems wrong.
>
We can certainly look at factoring out that control creation once we have
a probe function in wm_adsp to put them in. Which is what this patch creates.
> > I don't see the point of trying to fight against the design of ASoC with
> > the second probe. ASoC gives us what we need at the codec_probe stage
> > so why try to invent something different?
>
> Well, you could've still hung things off the struct device - it's not
> like the ASoC level device is a requirement here - and like I say the
I'm doing it in the codec_probe because by that time ASoC has created its
codec: debugfs node and I can put the dsp debugfs nodes under that. If I
created the debugfs earlier before ASoC has probed the codec that node
won't exist so I'd have to create my own debugfs node, and it seems a bit
odd and untidy to have some codec debug info under the asoc node but some
stuff somewhere else.
> fact that it's not actually factoring out the initialisation that's
> already happening at the ASoC probe isn't good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-09 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 15:16 [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Add code_probe and codec_remove stubs Richard Fitzgerald
2015-06-09 15:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Add basic debugfs entries Richard Fitzgerald
2015-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ASoC: wm_adsp: Add code_probe and codec_remove stubs Mark Brown
2015-06-09 16:13 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2015-06-09 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2015-06-09 16:43 ` Richard Fitzgerald [this message]
2015-06-09 16:55 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150609164329.GC27675@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox