From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754189AbbFJHqU (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 03:46:20 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:35123 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751456AbbFJHqM (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 03:46:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 00:46:11 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ming Lei Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Kleikamp , Jens Axboe , Zach Brown , Christoph Hellwig , Maxim Patlasov , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Tejun Heo , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] block: loop: support DIO & AIO Message-ID: <20150610074611.GD6964@infradead.org> References: <1433857766-6153-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <1433857766-6153-6-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1433857766-6153-6-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > + int ret; > + > + /* nomerge for loop request queue */ > + WARN_ON(cmd->rq->bio != cmd->rq->biotail); > + > + bvec = __bvec_iter_bvec(bio->bi_io_vec, bio->bi_iter); > + iov_iter_bvec(&iter, ITER_BVEC | rw, bvec, > + bio_segments(bio), blk_rq_bytes(cmd->rq)); > + > + cmd->iocb.ki_pos = pos; > + cmd->iocb.ki_filp = file; > + cmd->iocb.ki_complete = lo_rw_aio_complete; > + cmd->iocb.ki_flags = IOCB_DIRECT; > + > + if (rw == WRITE) > + ret = file->f_op->write_iter(&cmd->iocb, &iter); > + else > + ret = file->f_op->read_iter(&cmd->iocb, &iter); I think we really need a vfs_ wrapper here similar to what I did a while ago, e.g. vfs_iter_read/write_async. > +static inline int lo_rw_simple(struct loop_device *lo, > + struct request *rq, loff_t pos, bool rw) > +{ > + struct loop_cmd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq); > + > + if (cmd->use_aio) > + return lo_rw_aio(lo, cmd, pos, rw); > + > + if (rw == WRITE) > + return lo_write_simple(lo, rq, pos); > + else > + return lo_read_simple(lo, rq, pos); > +} And the io_submit style read/write also works for buffered I/O, so no need to keep lo_write_simple/lo_read_simple around. > @@ -1569,7 +1634,8 @@ static void loop_handle_cmd(struct loop_cmd *cmd) > failed: > if (ret) > cmd->rq->errors = -EIO; > - blk_mq_complete_request(cmd->rq); > + if (!cmd->use_aio || ret) > + blk_mq_complete_request(cmd->rq); If you don't complete the request here setting req->error doesn't make sense. I'd suggest to move the blk_mq_complete_request for everything but the trivial error case into the actual I/O handlers to clean this up a bit, too.