From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, david.vrabel@citrix.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch V2 2/3] usb: Introduce Xen pvUSB frontend
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:20:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612162007.GC15911@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434118201-25617-3-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Introduces the Xen pvUSB frontend. With pvUSB it is possible for a Xen
> domU to communicate with a USB device assigned to that domU. The
> communication is all done via the pvUSB backend in a driver domain
> (usually Dom0) which is owner of the physical device.
>
> The code is taken from the pvUSB implementation in Xen done by Fujitsu
> based on Linux kernel 2.6.18.
>
> Changes from the original version are:
> - port to upstream kernel
> - put all code in just one source file
> - move module to appropriate location in kernel tree
> - adapt to Linux style guide
> - minor code modifications to increase readability
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/usb/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/usb/xen/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/usb/xen/Makefile | 5 +
> drivers/usb/xen/xen-usbfront.c | 1647 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A subdirectory for a single file? That seems like overkill, don't you
think? As this is a USB "host" driver, why not put it in that
directory?
Also, last time these patches were posted, people asked why you can't
use libusb/usbfs instead, what happened with that? Or usbip?
> +config XEN_USB_FRONTEND
> + tristate "Xen USB frontend driver"
> + depends on XEN
> + default m
Remove this, default should be 'n'.
> +/* status of attached device */
> +struct vdevice_status {
> + int devnum;
> + enum usb_device_state status;
> + enum usb_device_speed speed;
> +};
Always run your patches through checkpatch.pl so people don't tell you
about the things that checkpatch.pl would have told you about...
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 14:09 [Patch V2 0/3] xen, usb: support pvUSB frontend driver Juergen Gross
2015-06-12 14:09 ` [Patch V2 1/3] usb: Add Xen pvUSB protocol description Juergen Gross
2015-06-12 16:23 ` Greg KH
2015-06-15 4:04 ` Juergen Gross
2015-06-12 14:10 ` [Patch V2 2/3] usb: Introduce Xen pvUSB frontend Juergen Gross
2015-06-12 16:20 ` Greg KH [this message]
2015-06-12 16:33 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-06-12 18:06 ` Greg KH
2015-06-15 4:36 ` Juergen Gross
2015-06-12 14:10 ` [Patch V2 3/3] xen: add Xen pvUSB maintainer Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150612162007.GC15911@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox