public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Li Zhang <zhlcindy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, tools: Fix crash in 'perf trace'
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:35:25 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612193525.GG6850@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150612060003.GA19913@us.ibm.com>

Em Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:00:04PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu:
> >From 6669ed960a3ee4f9a02790f60b6a73ffc82fd6de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 01:28:36 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] perf, tools: Fix crash in perf trace 
> 
> I get following crash on multiple systems and across several releases
> (at least since v3.18).

Trying it in perf/core I get:

util/evlist.c: In function ‘perf_evlist__mmap_read’:
util/evlist.c:645:6: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation
mark
  if (!md->refcnt)

Trying after changing it to !atomic_read(&md->refcnt)

And it fixes the segfault that I reproduced, but this still looks
strange, i.e. if it hit zero, then it should not have been used at this
point anymore... Will look at it again in the weekend. :-\

- Arnaldo

 
> 	Core was generated by `/tmp/perf trace sleep 0.2 '.
> 	Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 	#0  perf_mmap__read_head (mm=0x3fff9bf30070) at util/evlist.h:195
> 	195		u64 head = ACCESS_ONCE(pc->data_head);
> 	(gdb) bt
> 	#0  perf_mmap__read_head (mm=0x3fff9bf30070) at util/evlist.h:195
> 	#1  perf_evlist__mmap_read (evlist=0x10027f11910, idx=<optimized out>)
> 	    at util/evlist.c:637
> 	#2  0x000000001003ce4c in trace__run (argv=<optimized out>,
> 	    argc=<optimized out>, trace=0x3fffd7b28288) at builtin-trace.c:2259
> 	#3  cmd_trace (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>,
> 	    prefix=<optimized out>) at builtin-trace.c:2799
> 	#4  0x00000000100657b8 in run_builtin (p=0x10176798 <commands+480>, argc=3,
> 	    argv=0x3fffd7b2b550) at perf.c:370
> 	#5  0x00000000100063e8 in handle_internal_command (argv=0x3fffd7b2b550, argc=3)
> 	    at perf.c:429
> 	#6  run_argv (argv=0x3fffd7b2af70, argcp=0x3fffd7b2af7c) at perf.c:473
> 	#7  main (argc=3, argv=0x3fffd7b2b550) at perf.c:588
> 
> The problem seems to be a race condition, when the application has just
> exited.  Some/all fds associated with the perf-events (tracepoints) go
> into a POLLHUP/ POLLERR state and the mmap region associated with those
> events are unmapped (in perf_evlist__filter_pollfd()).
> 
> But we go back and do a perf_evlist__mmap_read() which assumes that the
> mmaps are still valid and we hit the crash.
> 
> If the mapping for an event is released, its refcnt is 0 (and ->base
> is NULL), so ensure we have non-zero refcount before accessing the map.
> 
> Note that perf-record has a similar logic but unlike perf-trace, the
> record__mmap_read_all() checks the evlist->mmap[i].base before accessing
> the map.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> index 080be93..084535b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
> @@ -634,11 +634,18 @@ static struct perf_evsel *perf_evlist__event2evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
>  union perf_event *perf_evlist__mmap_read(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int idx)
>  {
>  	struct perf_mmap *md = &evlist->mmap[idx];
> -	u64 head = perf_mmap__read_head(md);
> +	u64 head;
>  	u64 old = md->prev;
>  	unsigned char *data = md->base + page_size;
>  	union perf_event *event = NULL;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Check if event was unmapped due to a POLLHUP/POLLERR.
> +	 */
> +	if (!md->refcnt)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	head = perf_mmap__read_head(md);
>  	if (evlist->overwrite) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If we're further behind than half the buffer, there's a chance
> -- 
> 2.1.4

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-12 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-12  6:00 [PATCH] perf, tools: Fix crash in 'perf trace' Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-06-12 19:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-06-13  1:57   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2015-06-18  8:17 ` [tip:perf/core] perf trace: Fix race condition at the end of started workloads tip-bot for Sukadev Bhattiprolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150612193525.GG6850@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhlcindy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox