From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>, dhowells@redhat.com
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 23:50:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150615035051.GA2634@thunk.org> (raw)
>From experimentation and from looking at the sources, it appears that
the signature checking is only done in the kexec_file_load(2) system
all, and not in the kexec_load(2) system call. And I understand why
-- the signature is not sent from userspace to the kernel in the older
kexec_load(2) system call.
The problem is that if you use an old version of kexec, it will use
the old kexec_load(2) system call, and even though
CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, kexec_load(2) will happily load an
unsigned kernel, and then "kexec -e" will happily boot into it.
Correct me if I am wrong, but this appears to be a hole in Secure Boot
you could drive a Mack Truck through.
(I noticed this because Debian is still using a kexec-tools from the
stone ages, version 2.0.7, and I was wondering **why** I was able to
kexec boot completely unsigned kernels.)
It would appear to me that if CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG is enabled, the
old kexec_load(2) system call should be disabled (and a warning be
placed in the Kconfig help that the user should have at least verision
2.X of kexec-tools if they enable this kernel option).
Am I missing something?
- Ted
next reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 3:50 Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2015-06-15 12:14 ` kexec_load(2) bypasses signature verification Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 13:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-15 13:37 ` Josh Boyer
2015-06-15 20:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-16 19:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-16 20:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17 1:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-17 1:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 1:16 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 2:02 ` Dave Young
2015-06-18 13:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-18 14:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-19 6:21 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 8:18 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 13:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-25 8:48 ` Dave Young
2015-06-25 15:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-26 1:59 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 7:04 ` Dave Young
2015-06-19 13:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-17 3:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-06-17 10:55 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-06-18 1:25 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150615035051.GA2634@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox