From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 07:16:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150616141626.GI3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <558018DD.1080701@monom.org>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 02:38:53PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 06/16/2015 02:27 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:45:05PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >> On 6/15/15 7:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why do you believe that it is better to fix it within call_rcu()?
> >>
> >> found it:
> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> >> index 8cf7304b2867..a3be09d482ae 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> >> @@ -935,9 +935,9 @@ bool notrace rcu_is_watching(void)
> >> {
> >> bool ret;
> >>
> >> - preempt_disable();
> >> + preempt_disable_notrace();
> >> ret = __rcu_is_watching();
> >> - preempt_enable();
> >> + preempt_enable_notrace();
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> the rcu_is_watching() and __rcu_is_watching() are already marked
> >> notrace, so imo it's a good 'fix'.
> >> What was happening is that the above preempt_enable was triggering
> >> recursive call_rcu that was indeed messing 'rdp' that was
> >> prepared by __call_rcu and before __call_rcu_core could use that.
> >
> >> btw, also noticed that local_irq_save done by note_gp_changes
> >> is partially redundant. In __call_rcu_core path the irqs are
> >> already disabled.
> >
> > But you said earlier that nothing happened when interrupts were
> > disabled. And interrupts are disabled across the call to
> > rcu_is_watching() in __call_rcu_core(). So why did those calls
> > to preempt_disable() and preempt_enable() cause trouble?
>
> Just for the record: Using a thread for freeing the memory is curing the
> problem without the need to modify rcu_is_watching.
I must confess to liking this approach better than guaranteeing full-up
reentrancy in call_rcu() and kfree_rcu(). ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Here is the hack:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index 83c209d..8d73be3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> #include <linux/jhash.h>
> #include <linux/filter.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> struct bpf_htab {
> struct bpf_map map;
> @@ -27,10 +29,14 @@ struct bpf_htab {
> struct htab_elem {
> struct hlist_node hash_node;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> + struct list_head list;
> u32 hash;
> char key[0] __aligned(8);
> };
>
> +static LIST_HEAD(elem_freelist);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(elem_freelist_lock);
> +
> /* Called from syscall */
> static struct bpf_map *htab_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
> {
> @@ -228,6 +234,7 @@ static int htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
> void *key, void *value,
> memcpy(l_new->key + round_up(key_size, 8), value, map->value_size);
>
> l_new->hash = htab_map_hash(l_new->key, key_size);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&l_new->list);
>
> /* bpf_map_update_elem() can be called in_irq() */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&htab->lock, flags);
> @@ -300,11 +307,17 @@ static int htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map
> *map, void *key)
> if (l) {
> hlist_del_rcu(&l->hash_node);
> htab->count--;
> - kfree_rcu(l, rcu);
> + /* kfree_rcu(l, rcu); */
> ret = 0;
> }
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&htab->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (l) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&elem_freelist_lock, flags);
> + list_add(&l->list, &elem_freelist);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&elem_freelist_lock, flags);
> + }
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -359,9 +372,31 @@ static struct bpf_map_type_list htab_type
> __read_mostly = {
> .type = BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH,
> };
>
> +static int free_thread(void *arg)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct htab_elem *l;
> +
> + while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&elem_freelist_lock, flags);
> + while (!list_empty(&elem_freelist)) {
> + l = list_entry(elem_freelist.next,
> + struct htab_elem, list);
> + list_del(&l->list);
> + kfree(l);
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&elem_freelist_lock, flags);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int __init register_htab_map(void)
> {
> bpf_register_map_type(&htab_type);
> +
> + kthread_run(free_thread, NULL, "free_thread");
> +
> return 0;
> }
> late_initcall(register_htab_map);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 22:24 call_rcu from trace_preempt Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-15 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 1:09 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 2:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 5:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 6:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 6:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 6:34 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 6:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 6:54 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 12:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 12:38 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 14:16 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-06-16 15:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 17:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 15:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 17:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-16 17:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-17 0:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 0:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-17 1:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 1:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-17 8:11 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-17 9:05 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-06-17 18:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 20:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-17 20:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-17 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-17 23:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-18 0:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 15:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 17:14 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-06-16 17:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 19:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-16 19:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-06-16 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150616141626.GI3913@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox