From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756538AbbFRQl5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:41:57 -0400 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:37351 "EHLO e28smtp02.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbbFRQls (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:41:48 -0400 X-Helo: d28dlp02.in.ibm.com X-MailFrom: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:11:40 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched,numa: document and fix numa_preferred_nid setting Message-ID: <20150618164140.GB16576@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20150616155450.62ec234b@cuia.usersys.redhat.com> <20150618155547.GA16576@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5582EC99.8040005@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5582EC99.8040005@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15061816-0005-0000-0000-000005F838AB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Rik van Riel [2015-06-18 12:06:49]: > >> > > > > Overall this patch does seem to produce better results. However numa02 > > gets affected -vely. > > OK, that is kind of expected. > > The way numa02 runs means that we are essentially guaranteed > that, on a two node system, both nodes end up in the numa_group's > active_mask. > Just to add this was on a 4 node machine. -- Thanks and Regards Srikar Dronamraju