From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH regression 4.0 -> 4.1] tools perf: Fix build breakage if prefix= is specified
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 23:51:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150618215104.GA6360@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150618203935.GA4806@wunner.de>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:39:35PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:26:25PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> > It worked for me last week with OL6.
> > I created a standalone perf rpm with 4.1-rc6; it builds just fine with
> > _prefix (rpm variable) set to /usr:
> [...]
> > %global perf_make \
> > make -s -C tools/perf V=1 WERROR=0 NO_LIBUNWIND=1 HAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE=1
> > NO_GTK2=1 NO_STRLCPY=1 NO_BIONIC=1 prefix=%{_prefix}
> > %{perf_make} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT all
>
> You're not invoking tools/perf/Makefile.perf but tools/perf/Makefile
> and I would say this in line 18 avoids that prefix= is passed down
> to Makefile.perf:
>
> # We don't want to pass along options like -j:
> unexport MAKEFLAGS
>
> Sources:
> https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Options_002fRecursion.html
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/tools/perf/Makefile#n18
>
> So the prefix parameter should have no effect at all in your case,
> no matter to what you set it.
ouch, right:
"make automatically passes down variable values that were defined on the command line, by putting them in the MAKEFLAGS variable. See the next section. "
haven't realized Makefile.perf is used as primary makefile :-\
I think the patch is ok, I will try to come up with some tests
for this Makefile.perf usage.
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201506181332.t5IDWuUq027242@int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2015-06-18 19:29 ` [PATCH regression 4.0 -> 4.1] tools perf: Fix build breakage if prefix= is specified Jiri Olsa
2015-06-18 19:59 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-06-18 20:26 ` David Ahern
2015-06-18 20:39 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-06-18 21:51 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2015-06-18 22:07 ` David Ahern
2015-06-18 22:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-06-19 11:54 ` Lukas Wunner
2015-06-19 14:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-06-18 21:52 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150618215104.GA6360@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox