From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Peter Karlsson <peter@zapto.se>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: staging patch not in staging tree (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:03:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150623053334.GA4416@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150622133649.GB15439@sudip-PC>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:06:49PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> > On 2015-06-22 06:29, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > which tree have you been using?
> > > Greg will have three staging tree, use staging-testing
> >
> > I have used linux-next tree :/
> well, I am now confused why linux-next is not having this struct.
> at line 415 of drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> struct timeval tv; is there in staging-next. And today's linux-next
> has merged staging-next. Then how that struct timeval is not there in
> linux-next ?
I was doing a bisect to see why the files are differing in staging-next
and linux-next. And it turns out to be:
8b37bf430656 ("staging: ft1000: Replace timeval and time_t with time64_t")
which didn't go through the staging tree.
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-21 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] checkpatch fixes Peter Karlsson
2015-06-21 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment Peter Karlsson
2015-06-22 11:30 ` Sudip Mukherjee
[not found] ` <20150622122900.GD1354@laptop>
[not found] ` <CADVatmP4mkHFYzmhML6AvKjgPny1bfi2e=n_=WAt6SruaH4zOw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20150622124625.GE1354@laptop>
[not found] ` <CADVatmNJcjG_o6ro3LnHL8Q6myPfN5PWJ=oNcnFz6XHyjfZHgA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20150622130237.GF1354@laptop>
[not found] ` <20150622133649.GB15439@sudip-PC>
2015-06-23 5:33 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2015-06-23 8:05 ` staging patch not in staging tree (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment) Dan Carpenter
2015-06-23 8:12 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-21 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: ft1000-usb: shorten lines to under 80 characters Peter Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150623053334.GA4416@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@zapto.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox