From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: sameo@linux.intel.com, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: arizona: Fix race between runtime suspend and IRQs
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:28:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150624112839.GJ15013@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434292910-24919-1-git-send-email-ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Charles Keepax wrote:
> The function arizona_irq_thread (the threaded handler for the arizona
> IRQs) calls pm_runtime_get_sync at the start to ensure that the chip is
> active as we handle the IRQ. If the chip is part way through a runtime
> suspend when an IRQ arrives the PM core will wait for the suspend to
> complete, before resuming. However, since commit 4f0216409f7c
> ("mfd: arizona: Add better support for system suspend") the runtime
> suspend function may call disable_irq, if the chip is going to fully
> power off, which will try to wait for any outstanding IRQs to complete.
> This results in deadlock as the IRQ thread is waiting for the PM
> operation to complete and the PM thread is waiting for the IRQ to
> complete.
>
> To avoid this situation we use disable_irq_nosync, which allows the
> suspending thread to finish the suspend without waiting for the IRQ to
> complete. This is safe because if an IRQ is being processed it can only
> be blocked at the pm_runtime_get_sync at the start of the handler
> otherwise it wouldn't be possible to suspend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> index bebf58a..e60bcd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static int arizona_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>
> arizona->has_fully_powered_off = true;
>
> - disable_irq(arizona->irq);
> + disable_irq_nosync(arizona->irq);
> arizona_enable_reset(arizona);
> regulator_bulk_disable(arizona->num_core_supplies,
> arizona->core_supplies);
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-24 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-14 14:41 [PATCH 1/2] mfd: arizona: Fix race between runtime suspend and IRQs Charles Keepax
2015-06-14 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: arizona: Fix initialisation of the PM runtime Charles Keepax
2015-06-24 11:29 ` Lee Jones
2015-06-24 11:28 ` Lee Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150624112839.GJ15013@x1 \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox