From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752127AbbFXMbG (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:31:06 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60160 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751313AbbFXMbB (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:31:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:30:48 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-edac , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EDAC updates for 4. Message-ID: <20150624123047.GD32642@pd.tnic> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 05:14:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > This shows such a fundamental misunderstanding of what you should send > me that in starting to doubt all your other pull requests. How many of > them worked by our luck? If you are not testing what you actually send > me, I simply don't want to pull from you. It's that simple. Ok, now this is really uncalled for. I made the mistake of having the RAS x86 stuff going through tip - as it always does - and have the drivers/edac/ changes in the EDAC tree. But I have always merged the tip/x86/ras branch which contained the x86 changes into the EDAC tree when testing. Basically what I should've done with the pull request too. And dammit, I did test the hell of this thing. Like everything else I'm testing. I'm trying to do my best but I can only try. If there's anything I can do to stop you from doubting my pull requests, please let me know. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --