From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752310AbbFYNrw (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:47:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:58420 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751213AbbFYNqB (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:46:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:45:57 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 08/17] perf tools: Add Intel PT support Message-ID: <20150625134557.GB3253@kernel.org> References: <1432906425-9911-9-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20150619160451.GM3079@kernel.org> <55846E97.3050705@intel.com> <20150619194156.GE31188@kernel.org> <20150622182444.GI13937@kernel.org> <55886F7A.30702@intel.com> <20150622230005.GA8510@kernel.org> <5588FCCE.8090403@intel.com> <20150623151553.GD3489@kernel.org> <558C03FD.4020600@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <558C03FD.4020600@intel.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 04:37:01PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > On 23/06/15 18:15, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:29:34AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu: > >> On 23/06/15 02:00, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>> [root@zoo ~]# rpm -q glibc-debuginfo > >>> glibc-debuginfo-2.20-8.fc21.x86_64 > > > >>> But then, it didn't even resolve the DSO, which it should, as I did manually :-/ > > > >>> Will continue investigating... Perhaps this is fixed in another patch? What I > >>> have test merged so far is at my tmp.perf/pt branch. > > > >> I tried the same commands with perf tools from that branch (tmp.perf/pt) and > >> it seemed to work fine. > > > >> One reason for not getting symbols is compiling perf tools without ELF support. > > > > sure, but that is not the case here. But yeah, I'll try and triple check > > everything, next time will add the list of features detected to the > > problem report, so that you know which features were detected. > > How is it going? Yesterday was a holiday here, so no progress, will let you know when I make some. - Arnaldo