linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dwalker@fifo99.com
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-mips@linux-mips.org, david.daney@cavium.com,
	d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
	hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kexec crash kernel running with watchdog enabled
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:16:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150625201626.GA24392@fifo99.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fv5hc9z8.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:06:03PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> dwalker@fifo99.com writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 03:52:48PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> On 2015/06/23 23:05, dwalker@fifo99.com wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > Hi,
> >> > 
> >> > There was a commit in kernel/panic.c which altered when the kexec crash kernel is executed,
> >> > 
> >> > commit f06e5153f4ae2e2f3b0300f0e260e40cb7fefd45
> >> > Author: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> >> > Date:   Fri Jun 6 14:37:07 2014 -0700
> >> > 
> >> >     kernel/panic.c: add "crash_kexec_post_notifiers" option for kdump after panic_notifers
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > This made it possible for smp_send_stop() to be executed prior to calling the kexec crash
> >> > kernel.
> >> > 
> >> > The issue is that smp_send_stop() offlines the cores, and other code depend on the cores being online.
> >> > 
> >> > In my case on Octeon here's an example,
> >> > 
> >> > panic()
> >> >  crash_kexec()
> >> >   machine_crash_shutdown()
> >> >    octeon_generic_shutdown()
> >> > 
> >> > Inside octeon_generic_shutdown() the Octeon watchdog is shutdown for_each_online_cpu(), but since
> >> > most of the cpu's already got offlined in smp_send_stop() it means the watchdog is still alive on
> >> > those cores. This results in a reboot during the crash kernel execution.
> >> 
> >> Ah, I see.
> >> 
> >> > Another example seem to be in default_machine_crash_shutdown() where crash_kexec_prepare_cpus() depends
> >> > on an IPI for saving the registers on different cores. However, the cpu's are all offlined with
> >> > interrupts disabled so they won't be running those IPI's in this case.
> >> > 
> >> > I'm looking for any advice on how this should be fixed, or if it's already fixed. I'm not going to be
> >> > submitting a patch so if anyone wants to submit one feel free to do so.
> >> 
> >> Hmm, IMHO, when the cpu goes to offline in appropriate way(smp_send_stop), it should stop
> >> watchdog timer on the offlined cpu too.
> >> Or, you can also register crash handler which stops all watchdogs, but it's a bit tricky.
> >> 
> >
> > That doesn't really fix all the issue tho. As I was explaining generic MIPS code depends on the cpu's
> > effectively being online for crash data collection (with an IPI). This issue may effect other architectures also,
> > because smp_send_stop() offlines the cpu on other architectures also. I haven't surveyed the other architectures
> > enough to know what issue could happen from this tho.
> >
> > Is it possible to move the smp_send_stop() below the notifiers ? I'm
> > just throwing out ideas.
> 
> In general if you want reliability don't pass the kernel command line to
> run the panic notifiers.


We use the panic notifiers to "fail over" , or switch to a working machine. We could do
that in the crash kernel, but we would have to wait several seconds which is too long. Do
you know of a more stable way to accomplish that ?

Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-25 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20150623140548.GA15591@fifo99.com>
2015-06-24  6:52 ` kexec crash kernel running with watchdog enabled Masami Hiramatsu
2015-06-24 16:31   ` dwalker
2015-06-24 17:06     ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-06-25 20:16       ` dwalker [this message]
2015-06-26  1:02     ` Hidehiro Kawai
2015-06-26 18:33       ` dwalker
2015-06-29  9:53         ` Hidehiro Kawai
2015-06-29 12:26           ` Vivek Goyal
2015-06-30  8:36             ` Hidehiro Kawai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150625201626.GA24392@fifo99.com \
    --to=dwalker@fifo99.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).