From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging normal ones
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:58:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150701155815.GH3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iJEfeeOB5HxGdPpF9HFkrditbzQyDJK18BLDBZhgyDpmA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 04:08:27PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > OK, I'll bite. Exactly what seems especially vile about it?
>
> Presumably we would need to convert everything to async model
> (call_rcu() and friends),
> but that is a long way to go...
>
> For example, synchronize_srcu_expedited() in kvm_set_irq_routing()
> really looks overkill.
But synchronize_srcu_expedited() is SRCU, and does not disturb the
rest of the system.
Don't get me wrong, if converting it to call_srcu() helps, why not?
But synchronize_srcu_expedited() isn't messing up HPC or real-time
workloads.
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-01 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-30 21:48 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging normal ones Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/5] rcu: Prepare for expedited GP driving normal GP Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/5] rcu: Short-circuit normal GPs via expedited GPs Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 13:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 20:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 13:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 14:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 14:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 19:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-06 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 21:48 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/5] rcutorture: Ensure that normal GPs advance without " Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/5] rcu: Wake grace-period kthread at end of expedited grace period Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/5] rcu: Limit expedited helping to every 10 ms or every 4th GP Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-06-30 22:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 13:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 19:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:00 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging normal ones josh
2015-06-30 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 23:46 ` josh
2015-07-01 0:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 0:42 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-01 3:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 14:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 14:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-07-01 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-07-01 15:43 ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-01 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 14:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 16:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 20:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 21:20 ` josh
2015-07-01 21:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-02 13:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-02 18:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-07-02 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 21:07 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-07-02 19:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 1:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02 1:34 ` josh
2015-07-02 1:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02 2:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 2:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02 3:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150701155815.GH3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox