public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
	Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
	Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Warn about the wake-up sources not taken into account in suspend
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 18:04:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150701180429.3c3ef6de@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435684740-24912-5-git-send-email-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>

Hello,

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:19:00 +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> On the Armada 370/XP/38x/39x SoCs when the suspend to ram feature is
> supported, the SoC is shutdown and will be waken up by an external

waken -> woken

> micro-controller, so there is no possibility to setup wake-up source

source -> sources

> from Linux. However, in standby mode, the SoCs stay powered and it is

stay powered -> stays powered on

> possible to wake-up from any interrupt sources. As, when user decide to
> setup a wake-up source, there is no way to know if they will be
> wake-up source from suspend or from standby, then we chose allowing to
> setup all the interrupt as wake-up sources.

Hum. "Since when the users configures the enabled wake-up sources there
is no way to know if the user will be doing suspend to RAM or standby,
we just allow all wake-up sources to be enabled, and only warn when
entering suspend to RAM".

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c
> index 264073a777d8..4402dcfa7c56 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static int mvebu_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
>  		cpu_do_idle();
>  		break;
>  	case PM_SUSPEND_MEM:
> +		pr_warn("None of the wakeup sources will be taken into account in suspend to ram\n");

We already had some discussion about this, and I believe this continue
to be confusing: there are some wake-up sources taken into account when
in suspend to RAM: the special button used by the micro-controller. It
is indeed not a wake-up source in the Linux sense, but it is still a
wake-up source. With such a message, the user may believe that there is
simply no way of resuming the platform.

Maybe just:

	pr_warn("Entering suspend to RAM. Only special wake-up sources will resume the system\n");

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-01 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30 17:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add standby support for the recent mvebu SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2015-06-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: mvebu: Use __init for the PM initialization functions Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-01 15:18   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: mvebu: Add standby support Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-01 15:47   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-03 11:39     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-03 12:17       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-03 12:21         ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-03 12:33           ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-06-30 17:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: mvebu: Allow using the GIC for wakeup in standby mode Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-01 15:54   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-07-03  7:18     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-27 11:02     ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-28  9:42       ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-01 16:05   ` Sudeep Holla
2015-07-01 16:56     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-30 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: mvebu: Warn about the wake-up sources not taken into account in suspend Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-01 16:04   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-07-03  9:55     ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-25 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Add standby support for the recent mvebu SoCs Gregory CLEMENT

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150701180429.3c3ef6de@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=alior@marvell.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox