public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/5] rcu: Short-circuit normal GPs via expedited GPs
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 13:59:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150701205906.GQ3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150701100352.GO19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 12:03:52PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:48:27PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > @@ -2121,17 +2137,24 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
> >  					       TPS("fqswait"));
> >  			rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS;
> >  			ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
> > -					((gf = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) &
> > -					 RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
> > -					(!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
> > -					 !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)),
> > -					j);
> > +				((gf = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) &
> > +				 RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
> > +				(!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
> > +				 !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) ||
> > +				rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp->exp_rsp,
> > +						    rsp->gp_exp_snap),
> > +				j);
> 
> How about using a helper function there?
> 
> static inline bool rcu_gp_done(rsp, rnp)
> {
> 	/* Forced Quiescent State complete */
> 	if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS)
> 		return true;
> 
> 	/* QS not masked and not blocked by preempted readers */
> 	if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
> 	    !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
> 		return true;
> 
> 	/* Expedited Grace Period completed */
> 	if (rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp))
> 		return true;
> 
> 	return false;
> }
> 
> 	ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
> 		rcu_gp_done(rsp, rnp), j);

Fair point, and applies to the original as well, give or take comments
and naming.  Please see below for the corresponding patch.  Thoughts?

							Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit a8bb9abbf3690e507d61efe8144cec091ce5fb02
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 1 13:50:28 2015 -0700

    rcu: Pull out wait_event*() condition into helper function
    
    The condition for the wait_event_interruptible_timeout() that waits
    to do the next force-quiescent-state scan is a bit ornate:
    
    	((gf = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) &
    	 RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
    	(!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
    	 !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
    
    This commit therefore pulls this condition out into a helper function
    and comments its component conditions.
    
    Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4992bfd360b6..2afb8e8c5134 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1904,6 +1904,26 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Helper function for wait_event_interruptible_timeout() wakeup
+ * at force-quiescent-state time.
+ */
+static bool rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake(struct rcu_state *rsp, int *gfp)
+{
+	struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
+
+	/* Someone like call_rcu() requested a force-quiescent-state scan. */
+	*gfp = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags);
+	if (*gfp & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS)
+		return true;
+
+	/* The current grace period has completed. */
+	if (!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) && !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp))
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
  * Do one round of quiescent-state forcing.
  */
 static int rcu_gp_fqs(struct rcu_state *rsp, int fqs_state_in)
@@ -2067,11 +2087,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
 					       TPS("fqswait"));
 			rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS;
 			ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
-					((gf = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) &
-					 RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
-					(!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
-					 !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)),
-					j);
+					rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake(rsp, &gf), j);
 			rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_DONE_FQS;
 			/* Locking provides needed memory barriers. */
 			/* If grace period done, leave loop. */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-01 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-30 21:48 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging normal ones Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/5] rcu: Prepare for expedited GP driving normal GP Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48   ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/5] rcu: Short-circuit normal GPs via expedited GPs Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 13:42       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 20:59       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-07-01 10:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 13:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 13:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 14:03           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 12:03             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 14:06               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 16:48                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-02 19:35                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-06 14:52                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-30 21:48   ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/5] rcutorture: Ensure that normal GPs advance without " Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48   ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/5] rcu: Wake grace-period kthread at end of expedited grace period Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:48   ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/5] rcu: Limit expedited helping to every 10 ms or every 4th GP Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 21:56     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-06-30 22:10       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 13:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 19:30       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 22:00 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging normal ones josh
2015-06-30 22:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-06-30 23:46     ` josh
2015-07-01  0:15       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01  0:42         ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-01  3:37           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:12             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 14:01               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 14:08                 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-07-01 15:58                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 15:43             ` Josh Triplett
2015-07-01 15:59               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 10:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 10:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 14:00           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 14:17             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 16:17               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 17:02                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-01 20:09                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-01 21:20                     ` josh
2015-07-01 21:49                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02  7:47                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-02 13:58                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 18:35                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-02 18:47                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-07-02 19:23                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02 21:07                               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-07-02 19:22                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02  1:11                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02  1:34                   ` josh
2015-07-02  1:59                     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02  2:18                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-07-02  2:50                         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-07-02  3:15                           ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150701205906.GQ3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox