From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dell-laptop: Clear buffer before each SMBIOS call
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 17:45:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150702004544.GD27795@vmdeb7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435774101-12329-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 08:08:19PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Make sure that before initializing SMBIOS call input buffer does not contain
> any garbage (e.g values from previous SMBIOS call). This fix problem with
> passing undefined/random parameters to SMBIOS functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
> index 35758cb..6728487 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
> @@ -310,10 +310,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(buffer_mutex);
>
> static int hwswitch_state;
>
> +static void clear_buffer(void)
> +{
> + memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(struct calling_interface_buffer));
> +}
> +
> static void get_buffer(void)
> {
> mutex_lock(&buffer_mutex);
> - memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(struct calling_interface_buffer));
> + clear_buffer();
> }
>
> static void release_buffer(void)
> @@ -557,6 +562,8 @@ static int dell_rfkill_set(void *data, bool blocked)
> !(buffer->output[1] & BIT(16)))
> disable = 1;
>
> + clear_buffer();
> +
> buffer->input[0] = (1 | (radio<<8) | (disable << 16));
> dell_send_request(buffer, 17, 11);
>
> @@ -571,6 +578,7 @@ static void dell_rfkill_update_sw_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, int radio,
> if (status & BIT(0)) {
> /* Has hw-switch, sync sw_state to BIOS */
> int block = rfkill_blocked(rfkill);
> + clear_buffer();
> buffer->input[0] = (1 | (radio << 8) | (block << 16));
> dell_send_request(buffer, 17, 11);
> } else {
> @@ -774,6 +782,7 @@ static int __init dell_setup_rfkill(void)
> dell_send_request(buffer, 17, 11);
> status = buffer->output[1];
> buffer->input[0] = 0x2;
> + clear_buffer();
> dell_send_request(buffer, 17, 11);
This clears the buffer after modifying input[0] and right before
dell_send_request... so you're sending a completely empty buffer? Is that
intentional here? I guess I would have expected the clear_buffer to be one line
earlier.
> hwswitch_state = buffer->output[1];
> release_buffer();
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-21 8:39 [PATCH 0/4] Fixes for dell-laptop.c driver Pali Rohár
2015-06-21 8:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] dell-laptop: Update information about wireless control Pali Rohár
2015-06-22 19:06 ` Darren Hart
2015-06-21 8:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] dell-laptop: Check return value of all SMBIOS calls Pali Rohár
2015-06-22 18:26 ` Darren Hart
2015-06-27 7:34 ` [PATCH v2] dell-laptop: Check return value of all SMBIOS calls and do not cache hwswitch state Pali Rohár
2015-06-29 23:02 ` Darren Hart
2015-07-01 18:04 ` Pali Rohár
2015-07-01 18:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] dell-laptop: Clear buffer before each SMBIOS call Pali Rohár
2015-07-01 18:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] dell-laptop: Check return value of " Pali Rohár
2015-07-01 18:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] dell-laptop: Do not cache hwswitch state Pali Rohár
2015-07-02 0:42 ` Darren Hart
2015-07-06 10:09 ` Pali Rohár
2015-07-02 0:45 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2015-07-03 8:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] dell-laptop: Clear buffer before each SMBIOS call Pali Rohár
2015-07-06 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 " Pali Rohár
2015-07-06 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dell-laptop: Check return value of " Pali Rohár
2015-07-06 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dell-laptop: Do not cache hwswitch state Pali Rohár
2015-07-06 22:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dell-laptop: Clear buffer before each SMBIOS call Darren Hart
2015-07-07 14:04 ` Pali Rohár
2015-07-07 15:52 ` Darren Hart
2015-06-21 8:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] dell-laptop: Fix allocating & freeing SMI buffer page Pali Rohár
2015-06-22 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
2015-06-22 19:04 ` Darren Hart
2015-06-23 8:11 ` [PATCH] " Pali Rohár
2015-06-25 3:23 ` Darren Hart
2015-06-21 8:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] dell-laptop: Show info about WiGig and UWB in debugfs Pali Rohár
2015-06-22 19:05 ` Darren Hart
2015-06-22 18:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] Fixes for dell-laptop.c driver Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150702004544.GD27795@vmdeb7 \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox