From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: config RCU_EQS_DEBUG
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:00:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150703160037.GV3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150703100745.7993f403@endymion.delvare>
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 10:07:45AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> You just introduced a Linux kernel configuration option named
> RCU_EQS_DEBUG. Its short description is "Use this when adding any sort
> of NO_HZ support to your arch".
>
> I'm afraid this is a bad way to briefly explain what the option
> actually does (which is what the short description is for.) A sentence
> like "use this when adding any sort of NO_HZ support to your arch"
> should go in the help text, not the short description. The short
> description should be something like along the lines of "Enable
> consistency checks for RCU", for example.
>
> Additionally I see some inconsistency in the fact that this option
> defaults to n but the help text says "Say Y if you are unsure". BTW,
> option RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO is equally inconsistent with a default y and
> "say N if you are unsure" in the help text.
Hello, Jean,
I have the following queued, which should address your first point.
Would adding "default y" address your other point?
On RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO, I have a patch queued for v4.3 that eliminates
this Kconfig option completely.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcu: Clarify CONFIG_RCU_EQS_DEBUG help text
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 6be521990d61..80efaade5e59 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ config RCU_TRACE
Say N if you are unsure.
config RCU_EQS_DEBUG
- bool "Use this when adding any sort of NO_HZ support to your arch"
+ bool "Provide debugging asserts for adding NO_HZ support to an arch"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
help
This option provides consistency checks in RCU's handling of
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-03 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-03 8:07 config RCU_EQS_DEBUG Jean Delvare
2015-07-03 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2015-07-04 16:53 ` Jean Delvare
2015-07-05 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150703160037.GV3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox