Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] mfd: make mfd_remove_devices() iterate in reverse order

Andy Shevchenko
2015-07-06T09:30:28Z

On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be
> > > > used
> > > > when MFD
> > > > core removes the device.
> > > >
> > > > After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a
> > > > reversed
> > > > order. This
> > > > behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on
> > > > order,
> > > > i.e.
> > > > consider MFD device with serial bus controller, such as SPI,
> > > > and
> > > > DMA IP that is
> > > > attached to serial bus controller: before remove the DMA driver
> > > > we
> > > > have to be
> > > > ensured that no DMA transfers is ongoing and the requested
> > > > channel
> > > > are unused.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <
> > > > andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > Hmm… Seems kinda mistake. I can't see this applied (and required
> > previous patches 4 and 5) to any of your branch neither in
> > (today's)
> > linux-next.
>
> New stuff applied after v4.1 couldn't show up in -next before v4.2
> -rc1 was
> released (which just happened last night)?

Might be, I would like to resend new version of my series and that's
why I would like to have a branch to check what is already applied. So,
if I can't see it does it mean it is brewed in the private repository?

--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy