From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754376AbbGFQj6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:39:58 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:36617 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751644AbbGFQjz (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:39:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 18:39:50 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Andy Shevchenko , "x86@kernel.org" , Aubrey Li , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , "Kumar P, Mahesh" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86: pmc_atom: Add Cherrytrail PMC interface Message-ID: <20150706163950.GA22751@gmail.com> References: <1436192944-56496-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1436192944-56496-5-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20150706154425.GA19665@gmail.com> <20150706155008.GA3095@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >> > * Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> > > >> > > The patch adds CHT PMC interface. This exposes all the South IP device power > >> > > states and S0ix states for CHT. The bit map of FUNC_DIS and D3_STS_0 registers > >> > > for SoCs are consistent. The D3_STS_1 and FUNC_DIS_2 registers, however, are > >> > > not aligned. This is fixed by splitting a common mapping on per register basis. > >> > > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Kumar P Mahesh > >> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > >> > > >> > That's a weird signoff sequence. I changed it to: > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > >> > Acked-by: Kumar P Mahesh > >> > >> It might lack a From: Kumar ... > > > > Yeah, and got lost due to a rebase. Will change it to that, to preserve > > authorship. Won't push it out before I hear back from Andy though. > > To clarify: "It's based on the previous work done by Kumar P Mahesh." > and we can remove SoB. It's quite far from the code initially taken > from Kumar. > > Would you like me to update the commit message accordingly? Ok. Thanks, Ingo