From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Vatika Harlalka <vatikaharlalka@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cl@linux.com, cmetcalf@ezchip.com, bitbucket@online.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] nohz: Affining unpinned timers
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 18:54:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150706165405.GD4981@lerouge> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150623083133.GA587@vatika-Inspiron-3443>
I hope everybody received the patch because there is a ";" after each address :-)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:01:33PM +0530, Vatika Harlalka wrote:
> The problem addressed in this patch is about affining unpinned timers.
> Adaptive or Full Dynticks CPUs should not be disturbed by unnecessary
> jitter due to firing of such timers on them.
> This patch will affine timers to online CPUs which are not Full Dynticks
> in FULL_NOHZ configured systems. It will not bring about functional
> changes if NOHZ_FULL is not configured, because is_housekeeping_cpu()
> always returns true in CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL=n.
>
> Signed-off by: Vatika Harlalka <vatikaharlalka@gmail.com>
The patch looks good to me. Peter, Thomas, are you ok with it too?
Thanks.
> ---
> Changes: Patch sent to the right recipients.
>
> include/linux/tick.h | 9 ++++++++-
> kernel/sched/core.c | 9 +++++++--
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
> index f8492da5..145bcba 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
> @@ -133,13 +133,20 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
>
> return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> }
> -
> +static inline int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
> +{
> + return cpumask_any_and(housekeeping_mask, cpu_online_mask);
> +}
> extern void __tick_nohz_full_check(void);
> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick(void);
> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu);
> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_all(void);
> extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct task_struct *tsk);
> #else
> +static inline int housekeeping_any_cpu(void)
> +{
> + return smp_processor_id();
> +}
> static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
> static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
> static inline void __tick_nohz_full_check(void) { }
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 57bd333..acee856 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -599,18 +599,23 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(int pinned)
> int i;
> struct sched_domain *sd;
>
> - if (pinned || !get_sysctl_timer_migration() || !idle_cpu(cpu))
> + if (pinned || !get_sysctl_timer_migration() ||
> + (!idle_cpu(cpu) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)))
> return cpu;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
> - if (!idle_cpu(i)) {
> + if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
> cpu = i;
> goto unlock;
> }
> }
> }
> +
> + if (!is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu))
> + cpu = housekeeping_any_cpu();
> +
> unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return cpu;
> --
> 2.4.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-06 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20150623083133.GA587@vatika-Inspiron-3443>
2015-06-24 7:17 ` [PATCH RESEND] nohz: Affining unpinned timers Preeti U Murthy
2015-07-06 16:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-07-06 17:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-06 22:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-07 6:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 9:35 ` Vatika Harlalka
2015-08-03 14:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150706165405.GD4981@lerouge \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vatikaharlalka@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox