public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] kmod: Remove unecessary explicit wide CPU affinity setting
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 19:36:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150707173644.GA20422@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707171014.GH20498@lerouge>

On 07/07, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:30:30PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > > Not only useless it even breaks nohz full. The housekeeping work
> > > (general kernel internal code that user doesn't care much about) is
> > > handled by a reduced set of CPUs in nohz full, precisely those that are
> > > not included by nohz_full= kernel parameters. For example unbound
> > > workqueues are handled by housekeeping CPUs.
> >
> > Confused... I do not see how workqueue_attrs->cpumask can depend on
> > tick_nohz_full_mask or housekeeping_mask. Could you explain?
>
> People who want CPU isolation will likely write
> /sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/cpumask to a reduced set of CPUs, typically
> CPU 0 that is used for housekeeping in nohz full.

Well, khelper_wq is not WQ_SYSFS, so I am not sure this is possible.

But this doesn't really matter, people can change cpu affinity. But
"workqueues are handled by housekeeping CPUs" doesn't look right.

> In fact we should add the code which initialize wq_unbound_cpumask
> to housekeeping_mask automatically.

Perhaps, but until then the changelog above looks really confusing,
as if workqueue.c already does this automagically ;)

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-07 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-06 15:33 [PATCH 0/3] kmod: Make nohz-full friendly + cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-06 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] kmod: Bunch of internal functions renames Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-06 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] kmod: Add up-to-date explanations on the purpose of each asynchronous levels Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-07 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2015-07-08 12:54     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-06 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] kmod: Remove unecessary explicit wide CPU affinity setting Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-07 16:30   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 17:10     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-07-07 17:36       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-07-07 17:38         ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150707173644.GA20422@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox