Re: [PATCH 2/3] kmod: Add up-to-date explanations on the purpose of each asynchronous levels

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:07:58PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  6 Jul 2015 17:33:40 +0200 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > There seem to be quite some confusions on the comments, likely due to
> > changes that came after them.
> > 
> > Now since it's very non obvious why we have 3 levels of asynchronous
> > code to implement usermodehelpers, it's important to comment in detail
> > the reason of this layout.
> 
> There are still a few references to keventd in there.  One of them is
> simply wrong: "runs as a child of keventd".  The userspace code is
> actually a child of the khelper thread, yes?
> 
> I guess we should remove all kernel references to "keventd".  It got
> renamed to "kworker".

Right, I think I missed them because I confused khelper with keventd.
In fact here they are all children of khelper, which is the singlethread
workqueue tied to kmod.

But I'm working on a new iteration that makes use of a global no numa
workqueue.