From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753131AbbGNPdK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:33:10 -0400
Received: from mail.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:34798 "EHLO mail.us.es"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752436AbbGNPdH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:33:07 -0400
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from 127.0.0.1 by antivirus2 (envelope-from <pneira@us.es>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-2.10 
 (clamdscan: 0.98.7/20691. spamassassin: 3.4.0.  
 Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):SA:0(-103.2/7.5):. 
 Processed in 2.724744 secs); 14 Jul 2015 15:33:03 -0000
X-Spam-ASN: AS12715 87.216.0.0/16
X-Envelope-From: pneira@us.es
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:38:47 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
        linux-api@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: nf_ct_sctp: minimal multihoming
 support
Message-ID: <20150714153847.GA3507@salvia>
References: <20150714122311.8DA8EA0C9A@unicorn.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150714122311.8DA8EA0C9A@unicorn.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:23:11PM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> @@ -658,6 +696,18 @@ static struct ctl_table sctp_sysctl_table[] = {
>  		.mode		= 0644,
>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "nf_conntrack_sctp_timeout_heartbeat_sent",
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "nf_conntrack_sctp_timeout_heartbeat_acked",
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
> +	},
>  	{ }
>  };
>  
> @@ -705,6 +755,18 @@ static struct ctl_table sctp_compat_sysctl_table[] = {
>  		.mode		= 0644,
>  		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_sctp_timeout_heartbeat_sent",
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.procname	= "ip_conntrack_sctp_timeout_heartbeat_acked",
> +		.maxlen		= sizeof(unsigned int),
> +		.mode		= 0644,
> +		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec_jiffies,
> +	},
>  	{ }

I don't see the nla_policy updates for the netlink cttimeout
interface.