From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753326AbbGONB6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:01:58 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39083 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752193AbbGONB4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:01:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:01:52 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Olof Johansson Cc: Catalin Marinas , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Split out platform options to separate Kconfig Message-ID: <20150715130152.GG1005@arm.com> References: <1436958621-23524-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1436958621-23524-1-git-send-email-olof@lixom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Olof, On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:10:21PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote: > Let's move out the platform Kconfig entries to a separate file, since these > changes usually get moved through arm-soc instead of the arm64 arch tree, and > this will lead to fewer conflicts > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson > --- > > Will, Catalin, I'll merge this through arm-soc if I get your acks. Thanks! Fine by me: Acked-by: Will Deacon The only problem I can think of is how we resolve defconfig conflicts between you adding a new platform and us adding a new feature, since resolving those usually happens by regenerating the defconfig anyway. Maybe we just wait until -rc1 before adding new platforms to defconfig? Will