public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix VM domain ID leak
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:20:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150716152030.GB10969@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150714204731.10189.28556.stgit@gimli.home>

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 02:48:53PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> This continues the attempt to fix commit fb170fb4c548 ("iommu/vt-d:
> Introduce helper functions to make code symmetric for readability").
> The previous attempt in commit 71684406905f ("iommu/vt-d: Detach
> domain *only* from attached iommus") overlooked the fact that
> dmar_domain.iommu_bmp gets cleared for VM domains when devices are
> detached:
> 
> intel_iommu_detach_device
>   domain_remove_one_dev_info
>     domain_detach_iommu
> 
> The domain is detached from the iommu, but the iommu is still attached
> to the domain, for whatever reason.

Gaah, this whole vm_or_si special handling is a complete and fragile
mess.

The only reason for keeping the domain-id allocated in the iommu
seems to be that it can be re-used later, when another device behind
this iommu is attached to the domain. But this is hardly a justification
for the complexity and special case handling here, so how about this
diff instead:

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
index a98a7b2..c8fc8c8 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -4618,8 +4618,7 @@ static void domain_remove_one_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 
 	if (found == 0) {
 		domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-		if (!domain_type_is_vm_or_si(domain))
-			iommu_detach_domain(domain, iommu);
+		iommu_detach_domain(domain, iommu);
 	}
 }
 
This removes the caching of domain-ids, and iommu_detach_domain
correctly handles all types of domains (dma-api, vm and si). It should
be safe, but can you please double-check?


	Joerg


  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-16 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-14 20:48 [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix VM domain ID leak Alex Williamson
2015-07-16 15:20 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-07-16 15:43   ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-16 17:03     ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-22 21:01       ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-23 16:58         ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150716152030.GB10969@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox