From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756184AbbGPPnq (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:43:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]:37083 "EHLO mail-wi0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755480AbbGPPno (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:43:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:43:41 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft To: Joe Perches Cc: Viresh Kumar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Checkpatch: False positive Message-ID: <20150716154341.GJ3681@bark> References: <20150716105554.GA14080@linux> <1437060958.16262.28.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1437060958.16262.28.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:35:58AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > #31: > > arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- I guess those are in the limbo land between the end of message and beginning of the patch itself. Perhaps the test should at least stop at the end of header marker, at the '---'. -apw