From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_owner: set correct gfp_mask on page_owner
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:54:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720115352.GA13474@bgram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55ACDB3B.8010607@suse.cz>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:27:55PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 02:06 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 03:33:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >>@@ -2003,7 +2005,7 @@ int __isolate_free_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> >> zone->free_area[order].nr_free--;
> >> rmv_page_order(page);
> >>
> >>- set_page_owner(page, order, 0);
> >>+ set_page_owner(page, order, __GFP_MOVABLE);
> >
> >It seems the reason why __GFP_MOVABLE is okay is that __isolate_free_page
> >works on a free page on MIGRATE_MOVABLE|MIGRATE_CMA's pageblock. But if we
> >break the assumption in future, here is broken again?
>
> I didn't study the page owner code yet and I'm catching up after
> vacation, but I share your concern. But I don't think the
> correctness depends on the pageblock we are isolating from. I think
> the assumption is that the isolated freepage will be used as a
> target for migration, and that only movable pages can be
> successfully migrated (but also CMA pages, and that information can
> be lost?). However there are also efforts to allow migrate e.g.
> driver pages that won't be marked as movable. And I'm not sure which
> migratetype are balloon pages which already have special migration
> code.
I am one of people who want to migrate driver pages from compaction
from zram point of view so I agree with you.
However, If I make zram support migratepages, I will use __GFP_MOVABLE.
So, I'm not sure there is any special driver that it can support migrate
via migratepage but it doesn't set __GFP_MOVABLE.
Having said that, I support your opinion because __GFP_MOVABLE is not
only gfp mask for allocating so we should take care of complete gfp
mask from original page.
>
> So what I would think (without knowing all details) that the page
> owner info should be transferred during page migration with all the
> other flags, and shouldn't concern __isolate_free_page() at all?
>
I agree.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 6:33 [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_owner: fix possible access violation Joonsoo Kim
2015-07-15 6:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_owner: set correct gfp_mask on page_owner Joonsoo Kim
2015-07-16 0:06 ` Minchan Kim
2015-07-20 11:27 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-20 11:54 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2015-07-23 5:21 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-07-15 23:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_owner: fix possible access violation Minchan Kim
2015-07-23 5:11 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150720115352.GA13474@bgram \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).