From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm-move-mremap-from-file_operations-to-vm_operations_struct-fix
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:51:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720175145.GH21558@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150720173311.GA4379@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 07:33:11PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 07/20, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Oleg,
> >
> > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > Shouldn't we account aio events/pages somehow, say per-user, or in
> > > mm->pinned_vm ?
> >
> > Ages ago I wrote a patch to account the completion ring to a process'
> > memlock limit:
> > "[patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to
> > limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring"
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-aio&m=123661380807041&w=2
> >
> > The problem with that patch is that it modifies the user/kernel
> > interface. It could be done over time, as Andrew outlined in that
> > thread, but I've been reluctant to take that on.
>
> See also the usage of mm->pinned_vm and user->locked_vm in perf_mmap(),
> perhaps aio can do the same...
>
> > If you just mean we should account the memory so that the right process
> > can be killed, that sounds like a good idea to me.
>
> Not sure we actually need this. I only meant that this looks confusing
> because this memory is actually locked but the kernel doesn't know this.
>
> And btw, I forgot to mention that I triggered OOM on the testing machine
> with only 512mb ram, and aio-max-nr was huge. So, once again, while this
> all doesn't look right to me, I do not think this is the real problem.
>
> Except the fact that an unpriviliged user can steal all aio-max-nr events.
> This probably worth fixing in any case.
>
>
>
> And if we accept the fact this memory is locked and if we properly account
> it, then may be we can just kill aio_migratepage(), aio_private_file(), and
> change aio_setup_ring() to simply use install_special_mapping(). This will
> greatly simplify the code. But let me remind that I know nothing about aio,
> so please don't take my thoughts seriously.
No, you can't get rid of that code. The page migration is required when
CPUs/memory is offlined and data needs to be moved to another node.
Similarly, support for mremap() is also required for container migration /
restoration.
As for accounting locked memory, we don't do that for memory pinned by
O_DIRECT either. Given how small the amount of memory aio can pin is
compared to O_DIRECT or mlock(), it is unlikely that the accounting of
how much aio has pinned will make any real difference in the big picture.
A single O_DIRECT i/o can pin megabytes of memory.
-ben
> Oleg.
--
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-20 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 23:14 [PATCH] mm-move-mremap-from-file_operations-to-vm_operations_struct-fix Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-16 23:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-16 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2015-07-16 23:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 14:06 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2015-07-17 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 17:37 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2015-07-17 17:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 18:12 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-07-17 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 18:39 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-07-17 18:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 19:09 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-07-17 22:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-17 22:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-20 14:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-07-20 17:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-20 17:51 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2015-07-20 18:30 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-07-20 18:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-20 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-20 19:39 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2015-07-20 20:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 15:29 ` [PATCH v2] mm-move-mremap-from-file_operations-to-vm_operations_struct-fix Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 15:38 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2015-07-21 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 16:20 ` [PATCH v3] mm-move-mremap-from-file_operations-to-vm_operations_struct-fix Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150720175145.GH21558@kvack.org \
--to=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).