public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, X86-ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/mce: Provide a lockless memory pool to save error records
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:08:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721100824.GA26395@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721100330.GC32172@nazgul.tnic>


* Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote:

> > So how are we going to report uncorrectable errors that forcibly crash/panic 
> > the system if we cannot use printk? How will the admin learn what was amiss?
> 
> There's no change to that policy - we still panic for MCEs of MCE_PANIC_SEVERITY 
> and higher. And mce_panic() does use printk() to dump that critical information.

Ok, I see: through mce_print().

> The gen_pool stuff is for MCEs for which the hw still raises an #MC exception 
> but the severity code determines that we don't need to panic but do recovery 
> action.
> 
> However, we don't want to call printk() from the #MC exception handler since it 
> is NMI-like atomic context and printk is not NMI-safe (yet). Those printks are 
> issued later, in process context when we're done with the exception handler and 
> recovery action.

Ok - no objections then.

Thanks,

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-10 21:57 [GIT PULL] x86/ras material for 4.3 queue Luck, Tony
2015-07-15 11:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-16  7:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44     ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/mce: Provide a lockless memory pool to save error records Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44       ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/mce: Don't use percpu workqueues Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44       ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/mce: Remove the MCE ring for Action Optional errors Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44       ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/mce: Avoid potential deadlock due to printk() in MCE context Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44       ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/mce: Kill drain_mcelog_buffer() Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44       ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/mce: Remove unused function declarations Borislav Petkov
2015-07-16  7:44       ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/mce: Clear Local MCE opt-in before kexec Borislav Petkov
2015-07-17  1:16         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17  4:52           ` Raj, Ashok
2015-07-21  8:29       ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/mce: Provide a lockless memory pool to save error records Ingo Molnar
2015-07-21 10:03         ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-21 10:08           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150721100824.GA26395@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox