linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/14] uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:40:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721134028.GA4786@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721133945.GA4718@redhat.com>

The previous change documents that cleanup_return_instances() can't
always detect the dead frames, the stack can grow. But there is one
special case which imho worth fixing: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() can
return true when the stack didn't actually grow, but the next "call"
insn uses the already invalidated frame.

Test-case:

	#include <stdio.h>
	#include <setjmp.h>

	jmp_buf jmp;
	int nr = 1024;

	void func_2(void)
	{
		if (--nr == 0)
			return;
		longjmp(jmp, 1);
	}

	void func_1(void)
	{
		setjmp(jmp);
		func_2();
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		func_1();
		return 0;
	}

If you ret-probe func_1() and func_2() prepare_uretprobe() hits the
MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH limit and "return" from func_2() is not reported.

When we know that the new call is not chained, we can do the more
strict check. In this case "sp" points to the new ret-addr, so every
frame which uses the same "sp" must be dead. The only complication is
that arch_uretprobe_is_alive() needs to know was it chained or not, so
we add the new RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL enum and change prepare_uretprobe()
to pass RP_CHECK_CALL only if !chained.

Note: arch_uretprobe_is_alive() could also re-read *sp and check if
this word is still trampoline_vaddr. This could obviously improve the
logic, but I would like to avoid another copy_from_user() especially
in the case when we can't avoid the false "alive == T" positives.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c |    5 ++++-
 include/linux/uprobes.h   |    1 +
 kernel/events/uprobes.c   |   14 +++++++-------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index acf8b90..bf4db6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -989,5 +989,8 @@ arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(unsigned long trampoline_vaddr, struct pt_regs
 bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check ctx,
 				struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	return regs->sp <= ret->stack;
+	if (ctx == RP_CHECK_CALL) /* sp was just decremented by "call" insn */
+		return regs->sp < ret->stack;
+	else
+		return regs->sp <= ret->stack;
 }
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index c0a5402..0bdc72f 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct return_instance {
 
 enum rp_check {
 	RP_CHECK_CALL,
+	RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL,
 	RP_CHECK_RET,
 };
 
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index df5661a..0f370ef 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1511,10 +1511,11 @@ static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
 	return trampoline_vaddr;
 }
 
-static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, bool chained,
+					struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct return_instance *ri = utask->return_instances;
-	enum rp_check ctx = RP_CHECK_CALL;
+	enum rp_check ctx = chained ? RP_CHECK_CHAIN_CALL : RP_CHECK_CALL;
 
 	while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(ri, ctx, regs)) {
 		ri = free_ret_instance(ri);
@@ -1528,7 +1529,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	struct return_instance *ri;
 	struct uprobe_task *utask;
 	unsigned long orig_ret_vaddr, trampoline_vaddr;
-	bool chained = false;
+	bool chained;
 
 	if (!get_xol_area())
 		return;
@@ -1554,14 +1555,15 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 		goto fail;
 
 	/* drop the entries invalidated by longjmp() */
-	cleanup_return_instances(utask, regs);
+	chained = (orig_ret_vaddr == trampoline_vaddr);
+	cleanup_return_instances(utask, chained, regs);
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't want to keep trampoline address in stack, rather keep the
 	 * original return address of first caller thru all the consequent
 	 * instances. This also makes breakpoint unwrapping easier.
 	 */
-	if (orig_ret_vaddr == trampoline_vaddr) {
+	if (chained) {
 		if (!utask->return_instances) {
 			/*
 			 * This situation is not possible. Likely we have an
@@ -1570,8 +1572,6 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			uprobe_warn(current, "handle tail call");
 			goto fail;
 		}
-
-		chained = true;
 		orig_ret_vaddr = utask->return_instances->orig_ret_vaddr;
 	}
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-21 13:39 [PATCH v3 00/14] uprobes: longjmp / special-mapping fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:57   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:58   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:58   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:58   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:59   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] uprobes: Export struct return_instance, introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:59   ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Export 'struct return_instance', " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 13:59   ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive( ) tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 14:00   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 14:00   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 14:00   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-07-31 14:01   ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive( RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] uprobes: fix the usage of install_special_mapping() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 14:01   ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Fix the usage of install_special_mapping () tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] uprobes: use vm_special_mapping to name the xol vma Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 14:01   ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Use vm_special_mapping to name the XOL vma tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-21 13:40 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] uprobes: fix the waitqueue_active() check in xol_free_insn_slot() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-31 14:02   ` [tip:perf/core] uprobes: Fix " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150721134028.GA4786@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).