Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] iio: fix drivers that consider 0 as a valid IRQ in client->irq

[Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>]

On 23/07/2015 at 15:11:47 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Octavian Purdila
> > <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Since patch "i2c / ACPI: Use 0 to indicate that device does not have
> >> interrupt assigned" [1], 0 is not a valid i2c client irq anymore, so
> >> change all driver's checks accordingly.
> >>
> >> The same issue occurs when the device is instantiated via device tree
> >> with no IRQ, or from the i2c sysfs interface, even before the patch
> >> above.
> >>
> >> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1430908148-201129-3-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > Does this look OK to you? If so, could you pleas ACK the patch so that
> > Linus can pick it up in its for-next branch if/when needed?
> 
> Me or Torvalds?
> 
> This looks more like a Wolfram patch to me if it should not
> go through IIO.
> 

The first cover letter had:

"Linus, since the commit above was already merged in the GPIO tree,
should these fixes be merged also via the GPIO tree (with ACKs from
the others subsystem maintainers)?"

I believe it was referring to you ;). I can take the rtc patch if you
don't plan to take it.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com