From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] vfio-pci/iommu: Detach iommu group on remove path
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:27:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150723152752.5454e4b4@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437585057.5211.38.camel@redhat.com>
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 11:10:57 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 10:54 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 19:44 +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> > > When a user completes the VFIO_SET_IOMMU ioctl and the vfio-pci
> > > device is removed thereafter (before any other ioctl like
> > > VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD), then the detach_dev callback of the
> > > underlying IOMMU API is never called.
> > >
> > > This patch adds a call to vfio_group_try_dissolve_container() to
> > > the remove path, which will trigger the missing detach_dev
> > > callback in this scenario.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > > index 2fb29df..9c5c784 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> > > @@ -711,6 +711,8 @@ static bool vfio_dev_present(struct
> > > vfio_group *group, struct device *dev) return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static void vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(struct vfio_group
> > > *group); +
> > > /*
> > > * Decrement the device reference count and wait for the device
> > > to be
> > > * removed. Open file descriptors for the device... */
> > > @@ -785,6 +787,7 @@ void *vfio_del_group_dev(struct device *dev)
> > > }
> > > } while (ret <= 0);
> > >
> > > + vfio_group_try_dissolve_container(group);
> > > vfio_group_put(group);
> > >
> > > return device_data;
> >
> >
> > This won't work, vfio_group_try_dissolve_container() decrements
> > container_users, which an unused device is not. Imagine if we had
> > more than one device in the iommu group, one device is removed and
> > the container is dissolved despite the user holding a reference and
> > other viable devices remaining. Additionally, from an isolation
> > perspective, an unbind from vfio-pci should not pull the device out
> > of the iommu domain, it's part of the domain because it's not
> > isolated and that continues even after unbind.
> >
> > I think what you want to do is detach a device from the iommu domain
> > only when it's being removed from iommu group, such as through
> > iommu_group_remove_device(). We already have a bit of an asymmetry
> > there as iommu_group_add_device() will add devices to the currently
> > active iommu domain for the group, but iommu_group_remove_device()
> > does not appear to do the reverse. Thanks,
>
> BTW, VT-d on x86 avoids a leak using its own notifier_block,
> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c:device_notifier() catches
> BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE and removes the device from the domain (the
> domain_exit() there is only used for non-IOMMU-API domains). It's
> possible that's the only IOMMU driver that avoids a leak due to the
> scenario you describe. Thanks,
Thanks, that's good to know, so as a last resort I could also use the
notifier to work around the issue. But x86 seems to be the only arch
using this notifier so far, so a general fix would be nice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-23 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 17:44 [RFC PATCH 0/1] vfio-pci/iommu: Detach iommu group on remove path Gerald Schaefer
2015-07-21 17:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Gerald Schaefer
2015-07-22 16:54 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-22 17:10 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-23 13:27 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2015-07-23 13:03 ` Gerald Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150723152752.5454e4b4@thinkpad \
--to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox