From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753967AbbGXBez (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:34:55 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:50536 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753212AbbGXBew (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:34:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 22:34:48 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Steven Rostedt Cc: David Ahern , Adrian Hunter , Borislav Petkov , Frederic Weisbecker , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Stephane Eranian , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tools lib traceevent: Allow setting an alternative symbol resolver Message-ID: <20150724013448.GH3154@kernel.org> References: <20150723150433.GA3154@kernel.org> <20150723122130.716df9fe@gandalf.local.home> <20150723172554.GC3154@kernel.org> <20150723141039.1bd48bf2@gandalf.local.home> <20150723141133.4065321e@gandalf.local.home> <20150723212536.GE3154@kernel.org> <20150723173524.057a5969@gandalf.local.home> <20150723215246.GF3154@kernel.org> <20150723215836.GG3154@kernel.org> <20150723180730.6eecdce8@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150723180730.6eecdce8@gandalf.local.home> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:07:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 18:58:36 -0300 > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 06:52:46PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Em Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 05:35:24PM -0400, Steven Rostedt escreveu: > > > > Also I wonder if we should add a way to clear the resolver. That is, > > > > you want to use the default resolver? > > > I am adding a reset_function_resolver(pevent); > > > > Not really a necessity, as I don't see any current programs using it, > > > > but it would complete the interface. > > One more try: > Third time's a charm, or was this the forth? As many as needed would be put forth! > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Thanks! - Arnaldo